| Author |
Replies: 11 / Views: 1,181 |
|
|
Valued Member
495 Posts |
|
|
I'm putting away some new purchases and am having some difficulty differentiating between Scott #41 (violet brown), #42 (gray brown), and #44 (brown). There's some subtlety between these colors that I'm not seeing (color blindness?) ... they all look brown to me  ! I think I've got all three somewhere among these five but am unsure. What's your guess??? 
|
|
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
|
|
Rest in Peace
7742 Posts |
|
|
canyoneer I ran your stamps through 2 of my colour identification software programs, but came to the conclusion that time/water/moisture/sun light can affect the colour over time...Also my monitor, your monitor and everyone on here is NOT set to the same colour accuracy..This is hard when posting colours, without them in hand it is hard to classify.
Robert
|
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Valued Member
Canada
265 Posts |
|
|
Hey Canyoneer
from the upper left It looks like stamp 1 is the violet brown stamps 2, 4 and 5 are the grey brown (shades of the grey brown) stamp 3 is brown
Trodent |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Rest in Peace
7742 Posts |
|
|
Trodent has hit it pretty much on the colours..
Good eye trodent
Robert
|
Send note to Staff
|
| Edited by wert - 10/31/2018 12:45 pm |
|
|
Moderator

United States
12330 Posts |
|
|
Oh Robert...and you were doing so well there with your first response!   Don |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Valued Member
495 Posts |
|
|
Thanks everyone! My wife will be glad to hear that ... I had her non-philatelic eye guess the shades (she does have younger eyes) and her guess matched Trodent's. The top 3 were from an auction described as one of each shade (#41-#43). Trodent, does that software work off a color shown on a digital image? Where did you get it? |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
Canada
4648 Posts |
|
|
I have always said that the topic of colour is the hardest to explain. As the saying goes, 'colour is in the eyes of the beholder'
Chimo
Bujutsu |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Valued Member
Canada
265 Posts |
|
|
Hey Canyoneer. Did not use any software. Just my middle ages eyes, and also having great examples of each shade. I hope this helps I just used your examples to match my collection. Here are mine, The Dark brown is not listed(yet?) Gray Brown  Violet Brown  Brown  Dark Brown  Trodent |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
Canada
1394 Posts |
|
|
I am not knowledgeable of this issue, but noticed some irregularities in the facial area. There are probably many more irregularities in other areas of these stamps as they were produced in the earlier years of production. I believe that the fainter spots on the "Brown" stamp are due to a worn plate and that the "Dark Brown" stamp may just have surface damage. Posted only as my observations.  |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Valued Member
495 Posts |
|
|
I have an old book called "The Postage Stamps and Postal History of Newfoundland" by W. Boggs which is pretty good. It only describes two distinct versions of this stamp. First is 1880 as "violet brown (shades)" and second is 1896 as "deep brown". It's interesting in that the 1896 is listed as a "re-issue". According to Boggs, there were only 200 sheets of these "reprints" made. His description of this printing as:
"Printed from the same plates as the previous issues, and on similar paper, they can be distinguished by their brighter colors, clearer impressions, and yellowish, instead of white gum".
Somewhere along the way Scott (or some other cataloging entity) dropped the re-issue designation (for the brown) and split the violet brown into two colors (original violet brown + a gray brown). That's probably why the two 1880 colors have the same catalog value - no idea how many of each were printed.
|
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
New Zealand
726 Posts |
|
|
Love the post. Great stamp all around. My 25 cents:
1. Boggs book is a bible (i have both printings), and a solid required book. Even the bible though has errors only discovered later as facts presented. We do know that this stamp is from 1880 and 1896 from cover cancels etc. 2. The stamp is almost 140 years old. In my view color scanning and determination is fun but futile (so I'm aligned with Bujutsu above) 3. The NSSC (Walsh) from 2016 indicates three colors : Violet Brown (1880) but also Gray Brown (1880) which is different than Boggs. A 3rd variant of Deep Brown (1896) 4. The first two are same value in all usages so I'd just pick a spot and move on. Doesnt matter 5. The Deep Brown has some incremental value in used and mint but again, hard to know without verification. On a cover this stamp does command more value. Not because of the color but because the cancel date does not lie and while not definitive it is pretty solid fact. |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Valued Member
65 Posts |
|
|
These are all the 1 cent 1880-1896 Scott # 41-45  This may serve as a basic color guide, I never determine exact colors on a computer screen. Cheers |
Send note to Staff
|
|
| |
Replies: 11 / Views: 1,181 |
|