Stamp Community Family of Web Sites
Thousands of stamps, consistently graded, competitively priced and hundreds of in-depth blog posts to read








Stamp Community Forum
 
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

Another Great Classic Multiple Bites The Dust

Previous Page
 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 81 / Views: 5,402Next Topic
Page: of 6
Bedrock Of The Community
United States
10670 Posts
Posted 12/13/2018   10:43 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add revcollector to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
It's long passed for common post 1930 material, but it will not stop for anything earlier.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Valued Member
496 Posts
Posted 12/13/2018   12:46 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add canyoneer to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
I personally don't care too much about grading. I will send something in to PF or APS to simply verify authenticity or repairs, reperfs, Etc Other than that how it looks to me is all that matters.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
3499 Posts
Posted 12/13/2018   3:09 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add txstamp to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
I almost hesitate to mention this, but a post in another thread lit a light in my head in this regard.

Damaged multiples tend to stay intact, while sound ones, or ones that have at least one stamp sound in them, often get broken up.

I say this just to explicitly narrow the topic a bit - although this was of course implied already.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
3860 Posts
Posted 12/13/2018   4:09 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add jogil to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
It would be interesting if someone could make a listing of these different affected multiples with before and after pictures to show the extent and loss of such mutilations of multiples. Then copies of this could be sent to different stamp societies, stamp officials, stamp judges, stamp experts, etc. Others have made such before and after contrast compositions when documenting things that have been destroyed or changed. It would be interesting to see this for the historical recording.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Edited by jogil - 12/13/2018 4:12 pm
Valued Member
United States
276 Posts
Posted 12/13/2018   4:24 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Dry Tech to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Canyoneer: Exactly as I feel about grading. Actually the only reason I would get an item graded is if I were going to sell my collection. Even then it would be very hard for me to break a very well centered single stamp out of a block or plate block just to get a better price. I pray I will never be so desperate as to do that.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
3860 Posts
Posted 12/15/2018   09:32 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add jogil to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
It used to be a philatelic convention that imperforate stamps were collected at least in pairs in order to show an imperforate connection between the stamps with full blocks and multiples being even more preferred. Now we have these single stamps that are trying to change this by taking what I would consider a mutilating and damaging short cut out of all of the other surrounding stamps in defiance of the aforementioned philatelic convention. Are philatelic show judges now highly rewarding those that exhibit these kind of stamps that destroy all of their surrounding stamps as a legitimate and award worthy exhibition item?
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Page: of 6 Previous TopicReplies: 81 / Views: 5,402Next Topic  
Previous Page
 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.

Go to Top of Page

Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Stamp Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Stamp Community Family - All rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Stamp Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Privacy Policy / Terms of Use    Advertise Here
Stamp Community Forum © 2007 - 2026 Stamp Community Forums
It took 0.14 seconds to lick this stamp. Powered By: Snitz Forums 2000 Version 3.4.05