Stamp Community Family of Web Sites
Thousands of stamps, consistently graded, competitively priced and hundreds of in-depth blog posts to read








Stamp Community Forum
 
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

Classic Stamp Multiple Voting Poll

 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 9 / Views: 1,086Next Topic  
Pillar Of The Community
3860 Posts
Posted 12/13/2018   06:57 am  Show Profile Bookmark this topic Add jogil to your friends list Get a Link to this Message
Poll Question:
How would you classify the following stamp(s)?:

Choices:
Superb Single With Large Jumbo Margins
Block of 9 With 8 Mutilated/Damaged Stamps
Both of the Above
None of the Above

(Anonymous Vote)
Send note to Staff
Edited by jogil - 12/13/2018 07:17 am

Moderator
Learn More...
United States
5101 Posts
Posted 12/13/2018   09:14 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Partime to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
I should note that I rated it as a super jumbo. But would I be willing to pay a lot for it? No.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Rest in Peace
United States
920 Posts
Posted 12/13/2018   11:55 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Caper123 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
I would have liked one more selection...'The senseless destruction of 8 stamps to satisfy one irrational buyer'.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
917 Posts
Posted 12/13/2018   1:08 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add alub to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply


When deciding if a stamp is a jumbo, there seems to be two different criteria. If the stamp is perforated, the margins must be larger than the average stamp. Since the size of stamps can vary, the larger stamps are judged jumbo.This is a difference based on how the post office produced the stamp.

But with imperforate stamps, it is simply how a person cut the stamp.

What is not taken into account is the fact that in older stamps, not all the stamps were evenly spaced. If "jumbo" were treated the same for imperofate and perforated stamps, ie larger margins because of production irregularities, this nonsense would stop.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
2943 Posts
Posted 12/13/2018   1:11 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add stampcrow to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
I was thinking..., a dealer/collector in 1928 has an envelope stamped, postmarked and flown on a Zeppelin, that cover is given the label "philatelic".

A dealer/collector purposely trims a block down to one stamp and is rewarded with top grades...



Shouldn't the stamp above be labeled "philatelic" and given "no grade"?
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Edited by stampcrow - 12/13/2018 1:15 pm
Valued Member
United States
9 Posts
Posted 12/13/2018   1:17 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add StampPapa to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
I would call it a philatelic creation.

An artificial item created after the fact without any basis in postal usage.

I object to this is being held up as an example of 100 Jumbo as it distorts the standard.

Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Valued Member
United States
351 Posts
Posted 12/13/2018   5:22 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Louise411 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply

True StampPapa. A kind of Andy Warhol thing if you like that.

Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
1034 Posts
Posted 12/13/2018   5:54 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add rgstamp to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Agree with stampapa:

"Artificial item" with no philatelic purpose
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
3860 Posts
Posted 12/15/2018   09:28 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add jogil to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
It used to be a philatelic convention that imperforate stamps were collected at least in pairs in order to show an imperforate connection between the stamps with full blocks and multiples being even more preferred. Now we have these single stamps that are trying to change this by taking what I would consider a mutilating and damaging short cut out of all of the other surrounding stamps in defiance of the aforementioned philatelic convention. Are philatelic show judges now highly rewarding those that exhibit these kind of stamps that destroy all of their surrounding stamps as a legitimate and award worthy exhibition item?
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Edited by jogil - 12/15/2018 09:30 am
Pillar Of The Community
United States
7239 Posts
Posted 12/15/2018   10:46 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add bookbndrbob to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Frankenstamp
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
  Previous TopicReplies: 9 / Views: 1,086Next Topic  
 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.

Go to Top of Page

Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Stamp Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Stamp Community Family - All rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Stamp Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Privacy Policy / Terms of Use    Advertise Here
Stamp Community Forum © 2007 - 2026 Stamp Community Forums
It took 0.2 seconds to lick this stamp. Powered By: Snitz Forums 2000 Version 3.4.05