| Author |
Replies: 10 / Views: 993 |
|
|
Pillar Of The Community

United States
1773 Posts |
|
|
Poll Question:
Sorry to show the same stamp again but bear with me. After "sinclair2010" sharp eyes pointed out the miniscule crease on my #14 I got to thinking. Why should a little crease stop this stamp from getting a grade? Hence; 1. Original Stamp;  2. Remove Crease  3 Straighten Top  4. Remove Crease by trimming top and right  5 Straighten right side to remove crease.  Please vote in the poll below for the version that you think would grade the highest, which may not be the version you prefer. NOTE; No stamps were modified or damaged in the production of this post!!
|
|
|
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
Canada
1643 Posts |
|
|
4 & 5 also had the top straightned, didn't they?
In my opinion, leave the crease as in (1) and straighten top left only for appearance. |
Send note to Staff
|
| Edited by No1philatelist - 01/07/2019 10:14 pm |
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
673 Posts |
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
4111 Posts |
|
|
New Member
United States
4 Posts |
|
|
Dude! Leave it as-is and sell it to me (at a massive discount since it has that ugly defect) so you can go in search of the "more perfect" specimen! That stamp is completely awesome as it is--let me know if you want to sell it as I have a blank spot in my collection where it would fit PERFECTLY! |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
Australia
967 Posts |
|
|
It has excellent eye appeal the way it is, please leave it as original. Cheers |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Moderator

United States
12330 Posts |
|
|
Ken would not, of course, alter this stamp. But I would vote for this 'jumbo', rebacked, trimmed, and centered. :)  Don |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
713 Posts |
|
|
I don't know. But I like the idea of prompting some more discussion on fixing (manipulating, cleaning, whatever) stamps that you own. I know experts repair art, cars, furniture etc. Some devious persons probably do it to take advantage of less informed people. That is bad and I wish it did not happen but to improve something that you own and plan to keep is another story. Soaking a stamp to remove old hinges, gentle cleaning, pressing the stamp afterwards seem ok to me. Trimming an imperf stamp to make it more visually appealing (better grade) seems like a legitimate thing to do. However, adding backing paper, reperfing, filling holes and those things, without somehow (marking on the stamp?) noting this seem very wrong to me. Another example seen recently was where a block of 9 was destroyed so that the center stamp could be graded as jumbo. That was horrendous imho. |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Valued Member
United States
97 Posts |
|
|
I agree with wkusau's observations. "Gentle cleaning" (where possible at all) seems too sensible to need defending. "Soaking hinges off" typically removes what philatelists, rather than original users, had added to the stamp. As for the rest, maybe a good rule is "only do what the original user might reasonably have done" -- this allows for re-cutting the margin, but not repairing or reperfing. |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Valued Member
United States
283 Posts |
|
|
Quote: Why should a little crease stop this stamp from getting a grade? PSE would grade the stamp, just a question of how much deduction from a max grade for the tiny corner crease. PSE considers a "tiny corner crease" as a Minor Fault. The differences are substantial in pricing. A 95 stamp would drop to 80, and a 90 grade is reduced to 75. On a US 14 that's a price drop from $350 to $120. On the plus side, Siegel often offers 14's noting tiny corner creases and does not seem to hurt their pricing. |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
4111 Posts |
|
| |
Replies: 10 / Views: 993 |
|