| Author |
Replies: 41 / Views: 4,344 |
|
New Member
United States
4 Posts |
|
|
 So, Franklin has a very strange looking face here. Any thoughts about what might be going on?
|
|
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
3490 Posts |
|
|
Left side of design ok as #40 - or at least something from the reprint plate, aka proof. Middle and upper right looks like a piece of another stamp glued on. Maybe a #7.
This stamp is probably rebacked and maybe even had gum added. Look at the perfs all around. There is stuff in them that shouldn't be there. #40 was issued with no gum.
This stamp was someone's creation. |
Send note to Staff
|
| Edited by txstamp - 02/16/2019 7:59 pm |
|
|
Moderator

United States
12330 Posts |
|
|
 It looks Photoshopped. The stitch line extends beyond the stamp. Not sure if games are being played here but it can't be a good thing. Don |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
1317 Posts |
|
|
Don, That "stitch line" is a image scan issue if it goes through the stamp and background. I experience it very often. If the line goes through an important plaiting point, I have to rescan the image to put the line elsewhere. At 2400 dpi, the line will cut somewhere.
Oldurn, can you scan it over and repost it here? Maybe the face blur was a scan issue too.
|
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Moderator

United States
12330 Posts |
|
|
Agreed it might be a stepper motor scanner problem; I assumed the OP would have noticed it since the face area is what the thread was about. Don |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
3490 Posts |
|
|
Yes I get that line in a lot of my scans as well. Very annoying.
It usually doesn't cause this degree of distortion, however. Usually just the skew of the image at the point of the line. |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
8956 Posts |
|
|
Never mind the stitchline, the perforations look totally different on both sides of that line, and that sort of bugs me?
Peter |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
3490 Posts |
|
|
Perfs at right are obvious fake, as is the rest of the stamp as I outlined, pending scan verification. Stamp made from spare parts. |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
Canada
1643 Posts |
|
|
Hmm! One post and no response. Maybe the answer is what others have described. Digital manipulation of image. The face area looks like it was mushed as lines are not at all normal looking as if it was modified. |
Send note to Staff
|
| Edited by No1philatelist - 02/16/2019 11:19 pm |
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
1317 Posts |
|
|
Taking a closer look at that stamp, it appears to have been cut along design and pasted with another stamp. It is hard to tell how the face parts got mixed and where the cut there is.  |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
2555 Posts |
|
|
The purpose of this topic must be to amuse the OP. Maybe he/she has a lot extra time?
The image is of two different stamps spliced together along that line that appears to be a scanner artifact. Look at how the portion of the stamp right of the line is out focus. |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
673 Posts |
|
|
And oldurn hasn't returned to this thread since posting it... Looks like a time waster. |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
1808 Posts |
|
|
FWIW, oldurn is the name of a HipStamp seller.
ETA: from Texas |
Send note to Staff
|
| Edited by dudley - 02/17/2019 09:12 am |
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
1116 Posts |
|
|
Then its also odd the same question wasn't posed on the HipStamp forum... |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Moderator

United States
12330 Posts |
|
|
 Looking closer at this image, I am doubting that this is a scanner malfunction. The image appears to be two different sized images combined; this would explain why the left hand side is shifted down at the top and shifted up at the bottom. If this is a scanner glitch, I cannot think of a way it could shift it in two different directions and/or distort the image size. Don |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
3490 Posts |
|
|
I definitely agree that we need clarification on whether the scan is legit.
That said, when I tried to scan a die sunk large die proof, I just gave up. The problem was differing heights of the surface. The 'sunk' part would never get in focus. Scanning a 3D object in 2D == nope. If the stamp is stitched as it looks, that could create a similar 3D problem, and cause the lower section to be out of focus.
I agree - confirming scans front/back here are needed. |
Send note to Staff
|
|
Replies: 41 / Views: 4,344 |
|