New Forum: "No You Do Not Have A 594, 596, Or 613"

Suggest all posts claiming to have one of these that shows up in the classic US forum, the inherited stamp forum, or any other forum gets moved there along with a pinned topic on how to use a perf gauge and how to tell rotary from flat plate printings.

Here is a listing of U.S. sheet and coil waste stamps:

U.S. sheet waste stamps perf. 11 x 11: Scott # 544, 596, 613

U.S. coil waste stamps perf. 11 x 11: Scott # 545, 546, 594, 595

U.S. coil waste stamps perf. 11 x 10: Scott # 538, 539, 540, 541, 578, 579

I think we covered this before...adding new forum categories adds significant work at both the development level and the on-going Moderator level. At the developer level, someone has to go back and move all the existing threads into the new category. (No, the old threads would not simply be left in place, it would be done consistently and correctly.) At the Mod level, having more categories means burning more time moving thread around when people fail start them correctly. Remember, 99% of these kinds of thread are from brand new members who more times than not do not will not get them into the right category.)
Don

Fair enough, but it would be cool to have any poster who claims to have a 594 or whatever get their post moved to the "no you don't have one" forum and they could see the last 200 people who also didn't have one.

@jogil - sure those are the coil or sheet waste stamps, but only three of them are rarities.