Stamp Community Family of Web Sites
Thousands of stamps, consistently graded, competitively priced and hundreds of in-depth blog posts to read








Stamp Community Forum
 
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

Two More British Mysteries

 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 13 / Views: 1,057Next Topic  
Valued Member

United States
80 Posts
Posted 11/09/2019   01:23 am  Show Profile Bookmark this topic Add Rozie to your friends list Get a Link to this Message
Can anybody identify these?

Send note to Staff

Bedrock Of The Community
Australia
38679 Posts
Posted 11/09/2019   01:33 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add rod222 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Top:
1856 Revenue Chancery Court Typo De la Rue
Watermark = 2 Maces
Surfaced paper Perf 16

3/- (3 shillings) Barefoot # 29 Lilac CV 50c 1989

Lower:
Inland Revenue 1868
Typo De la Rue Wmk 14mm Anchor (No rope) Perf 14
Barefoot # 27 1d (One Penny) Lilac CV 5c 1989
Exists SPECIMEN CV $15
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Edited by rod222 - 11/09/2019 01:37 am
Pillar Of The Community
France
2926 Posts
Posted 11/09/2019   01:34 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add vayolene to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
British revenue stamps.
The first one is #13 (Chancery Court) in Forbin catalogue,year of issue 1856/7
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Bedrock Of The Community
Australia
38679 Posts
Posted 11/09/2019   01:41 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add rod222 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Your 1d has what looks like a postal cancellation
Duplex 5-1-1-5 37 or 237
37 = used in London
237 = Dartmouth
Nope, that is a 4-2-2-4 duplex.
CHANCERY COURT
Petitions could be brought before the court of the Chancellor of the King when the common law courts failed to satisfy.
(Notoriously cumbersome and expensive)
Usual cancellation =Manuscript
Source : John Barefoot.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Edited by rod222 - 11/09/2019 01:47 am
Pillar Of The Community
United Kingdom
3211 Posts
Posted 11/09/2019   09:35 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add nigelc to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
I agree the inland revenue stamp has been used fiscally.

It looks like die 4 so should be SG F22 (small anchor watermark) or SG F23 (orb watermark).

I think a 37 postmark (Buckfastleigh?) is unlikely given the symmetry of the postmark but I guess there are a few other possibilities.

I haven't seen a full table of post office numbers by the precise number of bars in the killer.

Have you considered 137 (Broadway), 337 (Harlow), 437 (Kirkby Stephen), 537 (Morpeth), 637 (Reigate) etc? Also D37 (Coggeshall) etc?

Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Nigel
Bedrock Of The Community
Australia
38679 Posts
Posted 11/09/2019   2:57 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add rod222 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Hi Nigel,

Quote:
I agree the inland revenue stamp has been used fiscally.
?

Nice work, about to consult my SG, and take this further, along with the Pmks. You have me working.


Quote:
I think a 37 postmark (Buckfastleigh?) is unlikely given the symmetry of the postmark

Agree, it's a 3 digit numeral, (or alpha numeric) I'd bank your wallet on it.



Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Edited by rod222 - 11/09/2019 3:00 pm
Bedrock Of The Community
Australia
38679 Posts
Posted 11/09/2019   5:35 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add rod222 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Nigel,
I am thinking this may be folly, I am not sure if I can count the bars correctly / accurately,
I'd need the stamp in front of me.
Could it be a 4-2-2-4 ? etc, it's hard to tell by the small image.

I discounted most, which left Broadway, Harlow, and Coggeshall, un accounted for, I have yet to find these duplexes.

Note: It seems to me (most) London hammers, do not have the vertical side bars, these appear mainly on Town Duplexes.

Certainly not "D37" London Inland Branch, Bulk Mail, the "3" forme does not match.

Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Edited by rod222 - 11/09/2019 5:37 pm
Pillar Of The Community
Australia
3282 Posts
Posted 11/09/2019   8:12 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Bobby De La Rue to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Numeral 37 was first issued to Seaton in Devonshire but the numeral was last used there in 1866.

The upright numeral with four bars top and bottom was introduced in 1864.

The upright numeral with three bars was introduced in about 1869.

The flat topped 3 will hopefully help narrow it down.

Here's a D37 of Coggeshall, on ebay:



Hope this info helps
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United Kingdom
3211 Posts
Posted 11/09/2019   8:41 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add nigelc to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
It's an intriguing puzzle Rod!

Yes, sorry, of course I meant that the stamp had been used postally!

I wrote that in too much of a hurry before going out.

I agree that it's not clear whether there are four or five bars at the top.

George Brummell wrote in his 1946 book in the context of discussing England and Wales duplex postmarks that he knew of the following postmarks with five bars at the top and bottom:

HULL - 383
GRAMPOUND - 671
SOUTHAMPTON - 723
ALEXANDRIA - B01

where this Alexandria is the one in Egypt

and also LIVERPOOL (I assume 466) with the name horizontal.

I guess the mark is probably from a duplex, either type G Duplex (name curved) or type H Duplex (name horizontal) using the terminology of Collect British Postmarks.

I suppose though that it could be an older type B (vertical) single postmark.

The stamp was cancelled no earlier than 1881 when die 4 stamps were first produced.

This would be too late to be an Inland Branch D37 postmark as this block of D numbers was last in IB use around 1870 according to Parmenter & Smith (on the GBPS website).

Coggeshall was listed as D37 in the 1882 official post office list so I think it's a possibility.

It's not clear to me how many different hammers may have been issued over the years to a single office (to to different offices when the post office number was re-assigned).

However, it would be satisfying to find an example of one that matches the postmark on this stamp.

I see the following postmark types for "?37" offices in Collect British Stamps lists the following (including only England & Wales types B, G & H) where the dates seem possible:

137 - Broadway - H
237 - Dartmouth - H
337 - Harlow - B, H
437 - Kirkby Stephen - H
537 - Morpeth - G, H
637 - Reigate - B, G, H
737 - Broadstairs - B, H
also Broadstairs/Station Office - H
and Broadstairs/Station Office B.O. - H
837 - Reeth - B
937 - Barnet - B, G, H
037 - Castletown/Isle of Man - B, H
D37 - Coggeshall - H
G37 - Grosmont/Yorks - H
H37 - Horley Station/Surrey - H
also Horley Station Rd - H
J37 - Bramley/Surrey - H
K37 - Mumbles - H
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Nigel
Pillar Of The Community
United Kingdom
3211 Posts
Posted 11/09/2019   8:45 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add nigelc to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Thanks for sharing your Coggeshall card Bobby.

Another candidate appears to have bitten the dust.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Nigel
Bedrock Of The Community
Australia
38679 Posts
Posted 11/09/2019   10:35 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add rod222 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Wow!
you guys have no idea how excited I get, when information like this flows,
I am like a 5 year old

Bobby, just Super! Unlisted in Allan's WW database, do you want to submit the scan ? Or l ? (I am assuming Coggeshall, Allan will no doubt confirm)

Nigel I need a week or so to evaluate all this info..........

Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Edited by rod222 - 11/09/2019 10:36 pm
Bedrock Of The Community
Australia
38679 Posts
Posted 11/09/2019   10:40 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add rod222 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Nigel,
There is Postmark "Mumbles" ? That's a new one for moi.

Wales
Looks like a beautiful bay.
"Mumbles" may be a corruption of the French les mamelles, meaning "the breasts."



Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Edited by rod222 - 11/09/2019 10:41 pm
Bedrock Of The Community
Australia
38679 Posts
Posted 11/09/2019   11:00 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add rod222 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Mumbles H Duplex K37 3-2-2-3 ebay
Addressed to Weston-super- Mare. (Glorious Somerset)
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Edited by rod222 - 11/09/2019 11:05 pm
Pillar Of The Community
Australia
3282 Posts
Posted 11/10/2019   05:05 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Bobby De La Rue to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
If you could submit the scan Rod I'd be much obliged!
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
  Previous TopicReplies: 13 / Views: 1,057Next Topic  
 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.

Go to Top of Page

Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Stamp Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Stamp Community Family - All rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Stamp Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Privacy Policy / Terms of Use    Advertise Here
Stamp Community Forum © 2007 - 2026 Stamp Community Forums
It took 0.21 seconds to lick this stamp. Powered By: Snitz Forums 2000 Version 3.4.05