Stamp Community Family of Web Sites
Thousands of stamps, consistently graded, competitively priced and hundreds of in-depth blog posts to read








Stamp Community Forum
 
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

Question On 1954 Czechoslovakia 10 Haleru Stamp

 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 5 / Views: 1,041Next Topic  
Valued Member

United States
11 Posts
Posted 03/04/2020   8:49 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this topic Add stampy1 to your friends list Get a Link to this Message
Is anyone familiar with this stamp? I don't have access to any catalogs...I'm just using the StampWorld site to identify my childhood stamp collection (using that term loosely). I believe it's identified as a 1954 "Figure of Value" stamp, with no watermark and perforation of 12.5. BUT...by my measurement, it's actually 11.25 by 11.75. So either I have the wrong stamp, StampWorld is incorrect on the perforation, or it's a variation they don't have listed. Any thoughts would be appreciated! Thanks.

Send note to Staff

Bedrock Of The Community
Australia
38679 Posts
Posted 03/04/2020   9:12 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add rod222 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Stampy it is a postage due
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Valued Member
United States
11 Posts
Posted 03/04/2020   9:17 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add stampy1 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Yes, it is. 12.5 perforation listed.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Bedrock Of The Community
Australia
38679 Posts
Posted 03/04/2020   9:22 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add rod222 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
These can be P12.5 and 11.5
Perf 11.5 is from a 1963 printing.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Valued Member
United States
11 Posts
Posted 03/04/2020   10:57 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add stampy1 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
So it's option C (a variation that StampWorld doesn't have listed). I have to admit a small part of me had hope for option D, that it was an error, but not too big a part due to prior experience with similar things on StampWorld. LOL!

Many thanks for taking the time to respond.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Bedrock Of The Community
Australia
38679 Posts
Posted 03/05/2020   02:50 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add rod222 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
You're welcome.
Note: Often Scott does not go to quarter guage in perforations, hence your slight variations. But they are the 1963 prints.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
  Previous TopicReplies: 5 / Views: 1,041Next Topic  
 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.

Go to Top of Page

Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Stamp Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Stamp Community Family - All rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Stamp Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Privacy Policy / Terms of Use    Advertise Here
Stamp Community Forum © 2007 - 2026 Stamp Community Forums
It took 0.14 seconds to lick this stamp. Powered By: Snitz Forums 2000 Version 3.4.05