| Author |
 Replies: 272 / Views: 21,589 |
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
Australia
925 Posts |
|
|
34. Red circle on T of POSTAGE (Watermark 40 Die II)  |
Send note to Staff 
|
https://www.fairdinkumstamps.com Fair Dinkum Stamps - Specialising in stamps from early Australia and the colonies, Australian philatelic literature, catalogues, stockbooks and accessories. |
|
|
Valued Member
New Zealand
137 Posts |
|
|
Another one I have not seen yet.
Can you confirm that you have more than 1 copies of them please.
Tasnaki |
|
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
Australia
925 Posts |
|
|
Tasnaki, Yes, I have at least two of all numbered constant flaws shown. The last two examples:    |
|
Send note to Staff
|
https://www.fairdinkumstamps.com Fair Dinkum Stamps - Specialising in stamps from early Australia and the colonies, Australian philatelic literature, catalogues, stockbooks and accessories. |
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
Australia
898 Posts |
|
|
Fairdinkumstamps.  Multi 'white void'(3) for u'r research. Partial envelope remnant still attached, so uncertain about exact w/mark. |
|
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
Australia
925 Posts |
|
|
Thank you for sharing your find, Finches.
That one is flaw number 7 on my list, plated by Tasnaki as 4A-8 (Plate 4, Pane A, Position 8) on page 5 of this thread. |
|
Send note to Staff
|
https://www.fairdinkumstamps.com Fair Dinkum Stamps - Specialising in stamps from early Australia and the colonies, Australian philatelic literature, catalogues, stockbooks and accessories. |
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
Australia
898 Posts |
|
|
Fairdinkumstamps,
Additionally, I don't quite know what's going on with the 'O' in south,...for a moment it looked odd ?!. |
|
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
Australia
925 Posts |
|
|
Finches,
The O in SOUTH looks normal, notwithstanding the postmark intrusion. |
|
Send note to Staff
|
https://www.fairdinkumstamps.com Fair Dinkum Stamps - Specialising in stamps from early Australia and the colonies, Australian philatelic literature, catalogues, stockbooks and accessories. |
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
Australia
925 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
New Zealand
137 Posts |
|
|
I have a couple of copies, one shows flaws in the left 'd' as well. do yours show this flaw?  Tasnaki |
|
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
Australia
925 Posts |
|
|
One has that part of the left d covered by the postmark and there is not a red flaw visible on the other one:   |
|
Send note to Staff
|
https://www.fairdinkumstamps.com Fair Dinkum Stamps - Specialising in stamps from early Australia and the colonies, Australian philatelic literature, catalogues, stockbooks and accessories. |
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
Australia
925 Posts |
|
|
36. White flaw on A of POSTAGE and cross of crown (Watermark 68)   |
|
Send note to Staff
|
https://www.fairdinkumstamps.com Fair Dinkum Stamps - Specialising in stamps from early Australia and the colonies, Australian philatelic literature, catalogues, stockbooks and accessories. |
| Edited by fairdinkumstamps - 01/07/2022 7:49 pm |
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
Australia
898 Posts |
|
|
Fairdinkumstamps.
That's an attractive 'Broken Hill' cancelled stamp. An opinion concerning it's 'o' in SOUTH....? |
|
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
Australia
925 Posts |
|
|
Finches,
That white mark on the 'O' in 'SOUTH' is just a left-over fleck of paper on the scanner or hagner. |
|
Send note to Staff
|
https://www.fairdinkumstamps.com Fair Dinkum Stamps - Specialising in stamps from early Australia and the colonies, Australian philatelic literature, catalogues, stockbooks and accessories. |
|
|
Valued Member
New Zealand
137 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
New Zealand
137 Posts |
|
|
This one is not a confirmed constant flaw, posting it as it looks as though it should be, has anybody seen it! Ref 726, watermark 68 (C/A).  Tasnaki |
|
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Replies: 272 / Views: 21,589 |
|
Posted 01/02/2022 12:20 am
