| Author |
 Replies: 272 / Views: 21,586 |
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
Australia
925 Posts |
|
|
Quote:
It appears on later prints only. Great information, thanks Tasnaki. 25. Scratch in shading right of shield (Watermark 40 die II)  |
Send note to Staff 
|
https://www.fairdinkumstamps.com Fair Dinkum Stamps - Specialising in stamps from early Australia and the colonies, Australian philatelic literature, catalogues, stockbooks and accessories. |
|
|
Valued Member
New Zealand
137 Posts |
|
|
Definately a constant flaw, at this stage I have it noted as a UCV.  Tasnaki |
|
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
Australia
925 Posts |
|
|
Quote:
I have it noted as a UCV It's definitely not in the last row.  |
|
Send note to Staff
|
https://www.fairdinkumstamps.com Fair Dinkum Stamps - Specialising in stamps from early Australia and the colonies, Australian philatelic literature, catalogues, stockbooks and accessories. |
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
Australia
925 Posts |
|
|
26. White flaws left of right value circle (Watermark 40 die II)  |
|
Send note to Staff
|
https://www.fairdinkumstamps.com Fair Dinkum Stamps - Specialising in stamps from early Australia and the colonies, Australian philatelic literature, catalogues, stockbooks and accessories. |
|
|
Valued Member
New Zealand
137 Posts |
|
|
Another one I have as a UCV. Still working through a pile of material but concentrating on the C/A plates first.  Tasnaki |
|
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
Australia
925 Posts |
|
|
27. Flaw on right spur of left value circle (Watermark 68)  |
|
Send note to Staff
|
https://www.fairdinkumstamps.com Fair Dinkum Stamps - Specialising in stamps from early Australia and the colonies, Australian philatelic literature, catalogues, stockbooks and accessories. |
|
|
Valued Member
New Zealand
137 Posts |
|
|
This is not one I have seen, how many copies do you have? Could you provide a scan of the whole stamp please, and is there a date on the cancellation?
Tasnaki |
|
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
Australia
925 Posts |
|
|
Only two copies - 1910 date on one of them   |
|
Send note to Staff
|
https://www.fairdinkumstamps.com Fair Dinkum Stamps - Specialising in stamps from early Australia and the colonies, Australian philatelic literature, catalogues, stockbooks and accessories. |
|
|
Valued Member
New Zealand
137 Posts |
|
|
Thank you, I will keep them on file as I am hoping to get some more blocks for both plates 5 & 6 soon.
Tasnaki |
|
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Valued Member
New Zealand
137 Posts |
|
|
Thought I would share this WM40 stamp, something went wrong with the printing in the shield panels plus a large number of other flaws! A one-off at this stage.  Tasnaki |
|
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
Australia
925 Posts |
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
Australia
925 Posts |
|
|
28. Flaws on upper left of left value circle, lower left shading and upper left scroll (Watermark 68)   On another copy, a plate crack appears to have developed to the right of the left value circle:  |
|
Send note to Staff
|
https://www.fairdinkumstamps.com Fair Dinkum Stamps - Specialising in stamps from early Australia and the colonies, Australian philatelic literature, catalogues, stockbooks and accessories. |
|
|
Valued Member
New Zealand
137 Posts |
|
|
I have this plated as shown below. Interesting that you have a copy showing the flaw 'h' but not flaw 'd'. Could you post or send me a scan ot the stamp without 'd'.  Tasnaki |
|
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
Australia
925 Posts |
|
|
Tasnaki, I have found the stamp 'without' your flaw (d) to be easier to find than 'with'. Some examples:    |
|
Send note to Staff
|
https://www.fairdinkumstamps.com Fair Dinkum Stamps - Specialising in stamps from early Australia and the colonies, Australian philatelic literature, catalogues, stockbooks and accessories. |
| Edited by fairdinkumstamps - 12/23/2021 4:03 pm |
|
|
Valued Member
New Zealand
137 Posts |
|
|
Thank you for posting those, interesting! The plating is 6B-32. From your pair, the stamp above would be 6B-26 which I have not yet seen. The scan below shows a possible match, but it would be a later print as the crown flaw and left frame flaw have increased.   Do you think this is a match? Tasnaki |
|
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Replies: 272 / Views: 21,586 |
|
Posted 12/17/2021 5:58 pm
