Togo "1919" S.c. #20 3-PF Brown - Double Impression - Catalog Number And Value Please

It's the exact same image shifted. It's the stamp and the features of the stamp that essentially are the reason for the post. You are all too hung up on terminology to just recognize the stamp for what it is. Pretty amazing and one of a kind.

Oh, we recognize it for what it is allright...

hey souldjer
i think your right about two things

1) beauty is in the eye of the beholder (unless your trying to sell it) then you need other peoples input for the market

2)terminology - one of a kind= E.F.O not much of a mark up for these (until a match is found making it a plate flaw) as far as I understand

i think its safe to say we all have a couple E.F.O's (we hold on to the beauty)

my thoughts :)

revenuecollector




Please stop replying to my topics. You are very condescending and not helpful.

This is my topic, not yours. So it's impossible for ME to troll YOU. Please stop criticizing me and belittling my opinions. You haven't offered a useful solution. You've offered no help in trying to determine how or why this happened. I've been courteous. I've been patient. I've been polite. I'm not coming after you at all. Why do you have to bash me all the time and seek me out? You are trolling me. You don't have to follow me, agree with my opinions or reply to my posts. These are my topics and my posts in the forum. You did not start them. You are the troll. Please leave my topics and me alone. I do not appreciate your tone or replies as they do not help in any way, shape or form.

It comes down to the port holes on the ship, mast and ribbon in my opinion. I've already highlighted the differences and moved that layer to demonstrate the overlay matches. I don't know how it got there but it's there. I've already stated that I believe it's a re-entry - somehow - in some way it was entered twice. If something is entered twice - isn't that re-entered / a re-entry?

No, you are just refusing to read/comprehend any opinion that disagrees with your assessment. People have explained to you from the get go what a double impression IS vs. what it is not, and I included several visual examples.

Your wishful thinking does not make something fact, and with every follow-up, you repeatedly assert that this item is something it is not, without any actual evidence.

The evidence is the stamp. I believe I've provided enough evidence. I've already said it is not a double impression. Stop trolling me and my topics. You are not helping.

souldjer777,
My opinion is that you are publishing/promoting misinformation but I think it is important to support even misguided opinions in our community. I have tried to have patience, please stop with your 'Messages To Staff' and accept that only you believe what you are posting. You are entitled to believe whatever you want but this thread has moved far beyond being productive.
Don

Works for me. Thanks.