Stamp Community Family of Web Sites
Thousands of stamps, consistently graded, competitively priced and hundreds of in-depth blog posts to read








Stamp Community Forum
 
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

Questions About Watermarks And Identifying A Few Stamps

 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 7 / Views: 722Next Topic  
Valued Member

Spain
9 Posts
Posted 01/05/2021   08:16 am  Show Profile Bookmark this topic Add Juan Garcia to your friends list Get a Link to this Message
Hi everybody,

Just trying to identify these stamps with watermarks. Can you help me?




A stamp Perf 12 seems Scott 300 but is watermark the 191?

B stamp Perf 12 seems Scott 331 with 191 watermark

C stamp Perf 10 seems Scott 425 with 190 watermark

D stamp Perf 12 not sure about watermark is Scott 335 or 378?

E stamp Perf 10 cant see any watermark so I suppose it's Scott 463?

Thank you very much for your help
Send note to Staff

Valued Member
United States
108 Posts
Posted 01/05/2021   09:57 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add percyjgp to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
The first stamp you listed as A can only be 300. There is no other watermark on the issue.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
796 Posts
Posted 01/05/2021   10:00 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add m and m to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
here are two sources for good references: stampsmarter.com and the reference section of the Scott catalog.
that said I think you are ok with a, (only way it comes), b appears to be a single line wmk to me, c is a nice example of the single line wmk. d appears to be a double line to me (check out the lower left corner again) and e is unwatermarked. hope this helps.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
1164 Posts
Posted 01/05/2021   10:26 am  Show Profile Check 3193zd's eBay Listings Bookmark this reply Add 3193zd to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Item C has a very odd shaped "S" it looks more like an upside down "5". Never seen that.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Michael Darabaris
Pillar Of The Community
United States
7239 Posts
Posted 01/05/2021   10:50 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add bookbndrbob to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Item A paper clip, item E thin.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Valued Member
Spain
9 Posts
Posted 01/05/2021   2:25 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Juan Garcia to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Thanks for answers

I updated capture

I think I got all except the blue one




A seems scott 300 with double line watermark

B seems scott 374 with single line watermark

C seems scott 425 with single line watermark

D I doubt here if it is single or double

and E seems no watermark, so scott 463

By the way, what do you mean, bookbndrbob, with clip paper and thin?
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
7239 Posts
Posted 01/05/2021   3:40 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add bookbndrbob to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
For item A, the scan shows a darkened area which approximates a crimp mark that could be made by a paper clip. I don't know how the pic was made, so it could conceivably be a sharp shadow made by a crimp or indentation.

For item E, the darkened area and the compromised perforations of that corner appear (to my eyes) to be a large thin spot.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Edited by bookbndrbob - 01/05/2021 3:41 pm
Pillar Of The Community
6349 Posts
Posted 01/05/2021   4:05 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add John Becker to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Stamp A: The images are squeezed-in from the sides. At a normal HxW ratio, is is clearly a "U", rather than a paperclip or other damage.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
  Previous TopicReplies: 7 / Views: 722Next Topic  
 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.

Go to Top of Page

Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Stamp Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Stamp Community Family - All rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Stamp Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Privacy Policy / Terms of Use    Advertise Here
Stamp Community Forum © 2007 - 2026 Stamp Community Forums
It took 0.14 seconds to lick this stamp. Powered By: Snitz Forums 2000 Version 3.4.05