Quote:
Isn't the post office trying to cut costs?
Now where would you get that silly idea? No, they are trying to reduce service expenditures (cut mail delivery, layoff postal workers...) not to reduce overall expenses, but so they can redirect expenditures to executive bonuses/compensation. Yeah, they get executive bonuses/compensation. How many government workers do you know that get bonuses?
The top 5 USPS executives earned $244K to $735K in 2009 when b/c is included. The poor executive in the #6 spot only got $100K. I guess he's only in charge of polishing the rear-view mirrors of the top 5. In all fairness, PMG Potter got no bonus last year, so he wasn't able to add onto his $735K. Of course, the top 3 executives have an annuity/pension package worth over $2M.
Now if a counter clerk, say, came up short $5000 after inventory, they would get probably get fired. What is the lesson to be learned? The stupid clerk should have came up short at least $100,000. That way, they could get a fast-track promotion to upper management -- future USPS executive pool!
Seriously. What happened to the days when managers would get fired for losing money? Now I realize that USPS is facing an uphill battle because of the internet. But I cannot for the life of me understand why Congress permits the 9 USPS executive officers to earn so much. There is a legislative salary cap (obviously way too high), and relative salaries of the other executives are supposed to match the salary ratios of the comparative marketplace. Why do USPS executives get this privilege when no other civil servants do? It's easy to blame the internet for the problems with USPS; and of course, we all like to poke fun at some of the postal workers (revenge for all the Sharpie attacks). But a big part of the problem are high-paid executives who aren't getting the job done; these bigwigs come up with some lame-brain ideas and rules/regulations, then expect an under-trained postal workforce to carry out these impractical ideas. Instead of laying off postal workers, they should start cutting at the top. It's amazing that it's easier to remove elected public officials than it is to force changes in the USPS leadership.

k