| Author |
Replies: 17 / Views: 1,665 |
|
Valued Member
United Kingdom
182 Posts |
|
|
|
I'm fairly new to collecting Australian stamps( normally Canada)..could someone advise which catalogues use the Scott numbering system..thanks in advance
|
|
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United Kingdom
8581 Posts |
|
|
Only Scott! I imagine that most collectors use Gibbons, or, for more detail, the Aussie catalogues. |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Bedrock Of The Community
Australia
38679 Posts |
|
|
Hi, I use Scott for my 10 Aussie albums. Then use Brusden White for the varieties,
They are expensive for the later versions, but early BW should able to be secured for a reasonable budget
The Brusden White 2004 Kangaroos , is the most desirable, it includes the Early Federal Period stamps. expect to Pay $50-$85 for that tome.
My advice, if you intend to take on Australia, haunt your bookstores, join a Philatelic club, and buy up any, and all Aussie catalogues, each offer in depth information, they all have pertinent info on their speciality, and can be had for pennies to low dollars.
I would have over 150 Australian catalogues.
|
Send note to Staff
|
| Edited by rod222 - 07/17/2022 1:42 pm |
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United Kingdom
8581 Posts |
|
|
One problem you'll find - especially when buying stamps - is that hardly anyone in the UK, unless they specialise in the US, will use Scott catalogues, which are, in any case, inferior to Gibbons et al for Commonwealth issues. |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Bedrock Of The Community
Australia
38679 Posts |
|
|
Inferior is only an opinion, I found Gibbons to be a pain in the neck, I wasted 5 years employing their unwieldy catalogues. They also do not segregate Air and semi postals, which I really like but not everybody's cuppa. Gibbons ergo is inferior to Brusden White But certainly, I have Gibbons early catalogues for the rare time I need to check specialties.
|
Send note to Staff
|
| Edited by rod222 - 07/17/2022 1:49 pm |
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United Kingdom
8581 Posts |
|
|
Unwieldy catalogues? The 1840-1970 is one volume, as is the Australian. I doubt if anyone else considers Scott superior to Gibbons for Commonwealth stamps. And its volume covering Australia comes in at over £100, I think. |
Send note to Staff
|
| Edited by GeoffHa - 07/17/2022 2:00 pm |
|
|
Moderator

United States
5094 Posts |
|
|
I'd like to answer this a slightly different way. If the OP is just interested in finding the Scott Numbers for certain stamps, or comparing the Scott number to SG number, then why not use the iPhone/iPad app, Stamp Identifier? It is free, though will constantly show you 5 second ads when using it. It also collects user data, as most Apps do. Here is a whole screen shot:  If you squint really hard at the last screen, you can see that the Audrey Hepburn stamp is listed by Michel number, Scott number, Yvert number, and Stanley Gibbons number. It has only failed a few times in the hundreds of times that I have used it. Highly recommended for the occasional user. |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Moderator

United States
5094 Posts |
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
Australia
3282 Posts |
|
|
If you're venturing into Australian Colonies, Gibbons is the best.
Brusden White's catalogue that Rod mentions above is truly superb, but offers no coverage for the 19th century.
Scott has its place, but is much more simplified than Gibbons. |
Send note to Staff
|
| Edited by Bobby De La Rue - 07/17/2022 5:34 pm |
|
|
Bedrock Of The Community
Australia
38679 Posts |
|
|
Quote: And its volume covering Australia comes in at over £100, I think. Another error $25 if purchased wisely Quote: If you're venturing into Australian Colonies, Gibbons is the best. True, in one respect, in others, not so. The collector, esp worldwide, is in my opinion, more comfortable, in using a catalogue set, whose lingua franca remains constant across all countries. It is so easy to construct a page for varieties, which one would also have to do even with Gibbons. Scott also has the value in worldwide recognition, and Steiner pages to boot. together with a beautiful catalogue font set that is easy to read and navigate (for the most part) Scott is supreme in my estimation, with specialsts catalogues, employed for drilling down.  |
Send note to Staff
|
| Edited by rod222 - 07/17/2022 10:01 pm |
|
|
Valued Member
United Kingdom
182 Posts |
|
|
Thank you for all your responses, I already have a Gibbons and I have found that after a certain date it only shows a picture of one if the stamps in a set, and as a beginner in Australia I find this most off putting. Although I have got used to it my Canada collection was built using the Unitrade catalogue which shows pictures of all stamps, also when purchasing from Hipstamp, I believe a lot of them advertise them with Scott numbers, so it would be easier to search by Scott numbers. |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
Australia
4031 Posts |
|
|
Am using a web site in the UK for very recent Australia called Steve Irwin Stamps. My standard Australia catalogue is Rennicks Stamps of Australia. Use both these catalogues for ebay listings. |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
Australia
975 Posts |
|
|
Quote: I'm fairly new to collecting Australian stamps( normally Canada)..could someone advise which catalogues use the Scott numbering system..thanks in advance From the perspective of illustrations, a copy of the 'Comprehensive Colour Catalogue of Australian Stamps' will assist. I focus on postage dues and find Scott to be a bit simplistic (although they have improved in recent times). Searches using multiple catalogue references can assist in locating bargains. |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United Kingdom
8581 Posts |
|
|
Rfw - if your tastes aren't too sophisticated, I have a few cheap and cheerful Aussie lots on ebay! |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Valued Member
United Kingdom
182 Posts |
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United Kingdom
8581 Posts |
|
Replies: 17 / Views: 1,665 |
|