| Author |
Replies: 8 / Views: 1,588 |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
6 Posts |
|
|
|
Greetings!
Is there any way to distinguish the Bill Pickett error sheets (#2870) that were sold before the error was discovered from those that were issued afterward (and sold by lottery)?
I ask because I purchased the corrected sheet (#2869) from a vendor on HipStamp but received the "recalled" sheet apparently by accident. Before I return it to the seller, I'm wondering if the originally sold error sheets have any distinguishing marks. The sheet I received was not in the blue envelope that enclosed the "recalled" sheets sent to the lottery winners.
|
|
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
4085 Posts |
|
|
I think a very few sold by accident before and I think the only way to tell they were before is if they were cancelled before the others were released. Not being in the blue folder is meaningless as they can simply be removed. |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
3224 Posts |
|
|
The error was known just before release, and all were pulled before the first issue day, so none were accidentally sold. The error sheets sold by lottery were the ones pulled before the first day of issue. A dealer who was also a USPS distributor had pre-distributed it to other dealers as normal. He called them all to advise them of the recall several days before the release day and all the originals had to be returned to USPS (or else). I know this because I was working in a stamp shop at the time and was the one who took the call.
The first ones won in the lottery had no identifying anything. This might explain the one you got. After awhile, the blue envelopes were used for the panes. You could obtain one if you didn't get one originally. There were also (at least) white envelopes also reported. |
Send note to Staff
|
| Edited by hy-brasil - 08/26/2022 01:34 am |
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
4284 Posts |
|
|
Quote: I think the only way to tell they were before is if they were cancelled before the others were released.  That is known as the Dag Hammarskjöld invert conundrum. |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Valued Member
United States
6 Posts |
|
|
Interesting about the envelopes--thanks!
It's a mint pane, so no cancellation date.
I wondered if perhaps plate numbers might distinguish the original error panes, but I suppose if the USPS deliberately produced more, they'd use the same plates and plate numbers (particularly to make the accidentally sold panes less valuable). |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
506 Posts |
|
|
I don't believe the USPS produced more of the original error. They did take about 115,000 of the returned panes and sent them to the lottery winners. They also produced a normal run of corrected panes. |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Valued Member
206 Posts |
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
3224 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
206 Posts |
|
|
Sold before the first day of issue, so presumably before the order to return. Stamps being sold before FDOI is a common occurrence. Linn's reports on it frequently. |
Send note to Staff
|
|
| |
Replies: 8 / Views: 1,588 |
|