I am a long time collector of British Colonial stamps and especially like the many definitive sets issued with the portrait of George V and a scene or scenic from the colony. So when I saw the headline
The death of George V in 1936 and why it still matters, I had to have a look.
It didn't take long for the author to make his point, that George V had been euthanized. His personal doctor, Bertrand Dawson, stated so in his diaries.
From the article:
Quote:
As it turned out, George V did not just peacefully die of his illness. He was put to sleep by his doctor who wrote in his diary: "At about 11 o'clock I decided to determine the end and injected 3/4 grain of morphia and shortly afterwards 1 grain of cocaine into the king's distended jugular vein…" DB gave three reasons for his regicide: (1) king deserved to die in a "dignified manner"; (2) His family deserved this over the uncertainty of an anguished and prolonged death, and (3) if the king did not die before midnight, it wouldn't have been in time; his death would have missed The Times headline and would be reported first in "less appropriate evening journals."
The third reason especially gets me,
not to miss a newspaper deadline!.
Here is a link to the article from which this was taken, should anyone be interested in pursuing it further.
https://alexkrainer.substack.com/p/...medium=email