Stamp Community Family of Web Sites
Thousands of stamps, consistently graded, competitively priced and hundreds of in-depth blog posts to read








Stamp Community Forum
 
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

1851 1c Franklin Plating

 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 8 / Views: 574Next Topic  
Pillar Of The Community
United States
1317 Posts
Posted 12/22/2023   09:43 am  Show Profile Bookmark this topic Add jaxom100 to your friends list Get a Link to this Message
Here is a stamp that someone asked me about. I was not informed about a PF until I was well into it. It has a 1984 cert indicating Scott #22 and was also sold by Siegel in 2008 as such. I think it is position 55R2. The copy is well worn at the bottom. Being a perforated stamp, that would indicate a late use of the plate. The alignment is a match at 55R2. I changed the color of the insert for visibility (see image). It has a double transfer at right that is not indicated in the Neinken drawings (see image). The comparison image that I am using is from the Franklin Archive website. That copy has a crease along the top of the stamp which makes things even harder. I do not have a copy of that position in the SS database. I would like to see any other position 55R2 that anyone has for more comparisons. Comments appreciated.





Send note to Staff
Edited by jaxom100 - 12/22/2023 09:57 am

Pillar Of The Community
United States
1805 Posts
Posted 12/22/2023   12:34 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add dudley to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
jaxom, here is a pair originally plated 55-56R2 by Mark Friedman. Note especially the guide dot from 45R2 with the small dash of color to the left.

The trace of scroll at bottom right on the stamp you are asking about suggests Plate 4 rather than Plate 2.





Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
3485 Posts
Posted 12/22/2023   4:06 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add txstamp to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
I agree with dudley that this one needs a careful critical look - which I cant do for now. The blur of color in G of POSTAGE reminds me of marks I often see on Plate 4.. but needs some careful study.

At some point I'll study it if noone else gets to it. Interesting item.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
1805 Posts
Posted 12/22/2023   5:25 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add dudley to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
jaxom, I think your stamp is 76L4.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
1317 Posts
Posted 12/22/2023   5:35 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add jaxom100 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
This one may be a better match.
Does anyone have a copy of 76L4?


Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
1317 Posts
Posted 12/22/2023   5:38 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add jaxom100 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Thanks Doug. I think we found it about the same time.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
1805 Posts
Posted 12/22/2023   6:00 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add dudley to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
This is my copy - not the best resolution.


Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
1317 Posts
Posted 12/22/2023   6:09 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add jaxom100 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
I made an ID image for the database as 76L4.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Rest in Peace
United States
652 Posts
Posted 12/23/2023   09:37 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add wtcrowe to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
I see that the PFC is signed by Neinken. I know from personal experience he would not have signed on a certificate as a type IIIA, unless he felt comfortable with the identification. He always looked at the 1˘ 1851-61 in his time as chairman.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
  Previous TopicReplies: 8 / Views: 574Next Topic  
 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.

Go to Top of Page

Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Stamp Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Stamp Community Family - All rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Stamp Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Privacy Policy / Terms of Use    Advertise Here
Stamp Community Forum © 2007 - 2026 Stamp Community Forums
It took 0.16 seconds to lick this stamp. Powered By: Snitz Forums 2000 Version 3.4.05