Stamp Community Family of Web Sites
Thousands of stamps, consistently graded, competitively priced and hundreds of in-depth blog posts to read








Stamp Community Forum
 
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

1st Day-Siegel's Gross Sale Sales Of Note - Hammer Only; Buyer Fee, Tax And Shipping Not Included

Previous Page
 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 17 / Views: 1,719Next Topic
Page: of 2
Pillar Of The Community
Learn More...
United States
1053 Posts
Posted 06/17/2024   2:07 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add ZebraMan to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
I've never understood the fascination with the different listings of the 9X1 with different styles of signatures, whether "ACM" or "AC M" or "A.C.M.", etc., I mean who doesn't have different styles of signatures if they are in a hurry or signing hundreds of objects at a time. Does "ACM" connected or "AC" connected indicate a different printing or any other meaningful distinction other than his hand moved in a different way when signing a small portion of the stamps? I guess the A.C.M. may have been attributed to someone else [his father?], but other than that, why do different styles of one man's initials deserve different catalog numbers?

And the missing signature, in particular the se-tenant, would that be considered an "error", kindof like a missing color error, where the signature on one stamp or row of stamps was accidentally missed, rather than an entire sheet being released unsigned?
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
3483 Posts
Posted 06/17/2024   3:21 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add txstamp to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Getting signatures from the three different signers of these stamps, and, in addition, a no-signature version, seems significant to me.

I agree that the varieties within signature would seem to be minor varieties (off-hand), but the different signatures themselves, vs no-signature, I would certainly consider to be major varieties, worth collecting.

This se-tenant item to me, seems pretty significant. It is difficult to compare it to a 'printing-error', although I understand your motivation for doing so.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Page: of 2 Previous TopicReplies: 17 / Views: 1,719Next Topic  
Previous Page
 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.

Go to Top of Page

Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Stamp Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Stamp Community Family - All rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Stamp Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Privacy Policy / Terms of Use    Advertise Here
Stamp Community Forum © 2007 - 2026 Stamp Community Forums
It took 0.11 seconds to lick this stamp. Powered By: Snitz Forums 2000 Version 3.4.05