Author |
Replies: 227 / Views: 7,900 |
Valued Member

United Kingdom
87 Posts |
|
As far as I can tell, this hasn't been done before. Let's see if we can create a sequence of numerals from 1 upwards. The numeral should ideally be the principal feature of the design, or at least prominent. I'll start with an 1874 Postage Due from Sweden. 
|
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
Canada
606 Posts |
|
And...BOOM The thread officially started.  Here's a #25 from Italy, 1865. Apologize for the stamp hiding a little the design.  |
Send note to Staff
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
Canada
606 Posts |
|
The thread continues... You should have had put a stamp with a 1/2 facial value first instead of starting with 1.  Here's a #LJ2, a rural postage due stamp, from 1862, Baden, Germany. (Apologize for the bad condition).  |
Send note to Staff
|
Edited by Captain Stamp - 03/30/2025 9:03 pm |
|
Bedrock Of The Community
11750 Posts |
|
Bedrock Of The Community
11750 Posts |
|
Pillar Of The Community
Canada
606 Posts |
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
8930 Posts |
|
Pillar Of The Community
Canada
606 Posts |
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
3350 Posts |
|
 Wow, thread derailed in less than three hours. Someone must feel proud.   Why wait, the fractional cent US revenues or even the 1 1/4 cent postage could have derailed this much faster. Of course the OP asked for Quote: numerals from 1 upwards and fractions or decimals are not considered a "numeral." So in an effort to retrack this thread I can't choose which is more appropriate:  or needed--  Of course US 1438 or 1927 might also be fitting here, but I don't want to jump numerical order.  |
Send note to Staff
|
Edited by Parcelpostguy - 03/31/2025 02:20 am |
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
3350 Posts |
|
Pillar Of The Community
Canada
606 Posts |
|
Quote: and fractions or decimals are not considered a "numeral."  Don't worry, the thread didn't derailed. But thanks for putting it on the good way again.  |
Send note to Staff
|
|
Bedrock Of The Community
11750 Posts |
|
Quote: and fractions or decimals are not considered a "numeral."  Anyway, that arbitrary approach eliminates so many fun candidates. Maybe we need to start a non-whole number thread. Roman numerals would be cool but how many are there. So many possibilities. |
Send note to Staff
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
Netherlands
5510 Posts |
|
If this has not already been done here before, SCF was the one exception among the stamp forums. |
Send note to Staff
|
|
Bedrock Of The Community
11750 Posts |
|
Pretty much all has been done before. If you use the search tool it returns many of these exact topics. Show us your multiples has been done ad nauseam. No harm in having fun but the search tool is badly overlooked. Every day there are questions asked that have been answered in amazing detail over the years but no one bothers to search. |
Send note to Staff
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
Netherlands
5510 Posts |
|
I tried the search tool for counting. It did not return anything relevant.
The search tool is quite inadequate. You must know what exactly you are searching. Then, still, it returns 10 pages and most will show posts in -irrelevant threads by someone who has participated in a thread relating to the search. If John Doe posted in "Arabic numeral" and you search for "numeral," it happily returns page after page of post by John Doe that do not contain the word "numeral." |
Send note to Staff
|
Edited by NSK - 03/31/2025 09:00 am |
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
8930 Posts |
|
I agree with rogdcam. I can not find it now but I do remember my favorite one. It was a list of US stamps only to see how far we go with whole numbers in sequence before we ran into a number that does not occur on a stamp
Peter |
Send note to Staff
|
|
Replies: 227 / Views: 7,900 |
|