| Author |
Replies: 19 / Views: 2,330 |
|
Valued Member
United States
6 Posts |
|
|
Note the map area to the left. The arrows within the image are distinctively different but I have not found any mention of this. Would this be considered as type I and type II Plate numbers are: 323242 1 and 846796 1 
|
|
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
|
|
Valued Member
United States
6 Posts |
|
|
Should read: Scott 2838 1944:Road To Victory Sheet
* * * Title changed by Moderator. You can also change the title of your own post, as long as it is done within 24 hours * * * |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
4336 Posts |
|
|
Yes something is going on there however, due to the quality and limited areas shown, one cannot tell. Can you provide clear closeups of single arrows as well as of both maps in their entirety? |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
8956 Posts |
|
|
In addition to the above post, can you also show the whole stamps, including the perforations ? Thank you And sorry parcelpost - you are probably asking the same I am!
Peter |
Send note to Staff
|
| Edited by Petert4522 - 07/05/2025 1:20 pm |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
6 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
6 Posts |
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
8956 Posts |
|
|
Really, we do need a much better, sharper image here. From some of the blue print it could be seen that there could be shifted plates or even an upside down color. Anyway, we need a far better picture
Peter |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
4108 Posts |
|
|
It does appear the yellow part of the line on the land is narrower on one and wider on the other. I don't see what the blue has to do with it. |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Valued Member
United States
6 Posts |
|
|
Eyeonwall, you are correct, the "BLUE" has noting to do with this. It's all the arrows that are the concern. As you noted the reversed red with yellow inside is actually the part of the arrow going onto land where the black produces the remain arrow point. These are of different width as it travel within the sheet. I'm trying to obtain a sample with plate numbers 111111 1 to see how it actually started with original plates. I did see one online which illustrated the reversed out red with yellow being of equal width to black arrow. If true, this would be an additional variation. |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Valued Member

United States
257 Posts |
|
|
I have all of the plate numbers except 4. Below are what I have found in looking through my examples. Plate numbers that start in "3", which is the red color, appear to be the ones with "narrow yellow" arrow as I call it. My guess is for the ones I don't have they are most likely "wide yellow" arrows.
Wide yellow in upward arrow pointing at the "N' in the word China: 111111 1 222121 1 434353 1 434363 1 434373 1 534383 1 554383 1 554393 1 654393 1 846796 1 854494 1
Narrow yellow in upward arrow pointing at the "N" in the word China: 322131 1 322232 1 323232 1 323242 1
Numbers missing from my collection: 434383 1 643931 1 754393 1 754494 1
Interesting catch. |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Valued Member
66 Posts |
|
|
Nice find by the OP Uncle Mo, It goes to show even after 31 years you never know what you might find. I would also have a tendency to agree with mstocky2, it does seem that this would be a distinct variety on the plates beginning with #3. I wonder if Scott's would list this as a variety (or at least mention it) if it was brought to their attention.
One other note, on the second close up scan with the thin yellow line, the yellow appears to be missing in the upper right area. Not sure if that's an anomaly from the scan/pic or if it's actually missing in that area.
Edit: Correct typo |
Send note to Staff
|
| Edited by mike2006 - 07/07/2025 8:11 pm |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
6 Posts |
|
|
MStock2 - thank you for verificating these two variations and additionally the plate numbers involved. Guess my next question would be: Are they Type I and Type II or #2838a and 2838b?
Mike2006 - yellow was not missing, to obtain such a close-up the light direction had to be placed at an angle which nutralized the yellow to white. |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Valued Member
66 Posts |
|
|
"yellow was not missing, to obtain such a close-up the light direction had to be placed at an angle which nutralized the yellow to white."
Uncle Mo - I figured it was something like that, thanks for the clarification. |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
4336 Posts |
|
|
I have been away from this and have little time to review the details, but to add this for now:
As for Scott listing the issue here is not on the stamps but affecting the selvage. That said, listing could occur first if this is plate number or numbers specific. Additionally Scott has listed items where the stamps themselves were not affected but the selvage was. See Scott 2875, the 1998 BEP S/S of four $2.00 stamps for several such selvage varieties. |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
4108 Posts |
|
|
If it depend on the red plate number, then it isn't a narrow yellow, it is wide red |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Valued Member
United States
54 Posts |
|
|
@mstocky2 do you try to get all the plate #s?
If there is some way to message me I will drop a 434383 to you...
Looks like I have two sheets with that plate and two sheets of 434363.
But I don't think you can message me till I hit 50 posts |
Send note to Staff
|
|
Replies: 19 / Views: 2,330 |
|