Stamp Community Family of Web Sites
Thousands of stamps, consistently graded, competitively priced and hundreds of in-depth blog posts to read








Stamp Community Forum
 
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

Different Types Of "Sewing Machine" Perforations?

 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 0 / Views: 354Next Topic  
Pillar Of The Community
United States
6445 Posts
Posted 03/28/2026   8:09 pm  Show Profile Check revenuecollector's eBay Listings Bookmark this topic Add revenuecollector to your friends list Get a Link to this Message
The late Jim Drummond absolutely loathed the term "sewing machine perforations" understandably, as these privately made perforations were most likely not done on sewing machines. He and I would occasionally spar about the issue, as I viewed it as a descriptive term, not necessarily a technically accurate term.

Philatelists know what you mean when you use the term, even if the perforations were made by various rotary perf wheels, etc. Mike Morrissey's response to Jim's article in the Q1 2016 issue of The American Revenuer used the term "pin-rouletted".

That said, not all sewing perforations on U.S. revenues have the same characteristics. I categorized them as two distinct types: "fluffy" and "pin-perforated." The former I've seen on R19, R112, and R115, and the latter on R120, RB3, and a single example of R112.

Some of the "pin-perforated" examples could also be a result of being scissor-cut along the perforations as opposed to being manually separated.

Examples from my collection follow.

Fluffy:








Pin-perforated:








No matter how you slice it, it's pretty apparent that they weren't all perforated on the same equipment, nor at the same time (especially as the R19 private perfs preceded the rest by almost a decade).

Now comes yet another "type" that has characteristics unlike the two prior groups. I picked this up in January of last year at an MSDA stamp show. Even though I have numerous examples of the sewing machine perfs, this one just looked different from all the others I had seen with respect to the shape of the perforations.





Jim, in his article, maintained that these "not-sewing-machine perfs" came from a single centralized source, which he opined was Joseph R. Carpenter. Most of the responses to his article disagreed, believing it more likely that one or more revenue agent offices may have perforated them prior to delivery to companies, or perhaps larger companies themselves upon receipt.

The more variance in perforation types/shapes that are discovered, the more it favors a decentralized perforating than centralized, in my opinion.

Thoughts?
Send note to Staff

  Previous TopicReplies: 0 / Views: 354Next Topic  
 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.

Go to Top of Page

Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Stamp Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Stamp Community Family - All rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Stamp Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Privacy Policy / Terms of Use    Advertise Here
Stamp Community Forum © 2007 - 2026 Stamp Community Forums
It took 0.18 seconds to lick this stamp. Powered By: Snitz Forums 2000 Version 3.4.05