Stamp Community Family of Web Sites
Thousands of stamps, consistently graded, competitively priced and hundreds of in-depth blog posts to read








Stamp Community Forum
 
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

1c Franklin Imperf - Help Please

 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Replies: 1 / Views: 40Next Topic  
Valued Member
United States
231 Posts
Posted Today  2 Hrs 14 Min ago  Show Profile Bookmark this topic Add sheetguy2 to your friends list Get a Link to this Message
Attached is a scan of the item in question.....
Appears to be TOP ROW -- each with 2 plating dots UR...
no expert here.....hoping one here can help identify.
Thanks.....Kevin
Send note to Staff

Pillar Of The Community
Learn More...
United States
1127 Posts
Posted Today  4 Min ago  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add ZebraMan to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
The top row of Scott #9 is one of the easiest stamps to plate especially with the online tools available today. Having a pair with full margins makes it almost impossible to get wrong.
Starting with the Guide Dot Illustrations on Stamp Smarter,
https://stampsmarter.org/features/S...Plating.html
The ornaments at the top are full, meaning that it is from the right pane not the left, so we are looking for Plate 1 Right Late.

The position of the guide dots brings us to a match at 7R1L and 8R1L.

The double transfer of the top ornaments of the left stamp confirms the 7R1L position which is a premium position because before the plate was recut, that position in the early state of Plate 1 (position 7R1E) is where the rare Scott #5 comes from. Below is a picture from the Stamp Smarter database where I added arrows pointing to the most obvious elements of the double transfer. Compare those spots on the left stamp with the right stamp. That is a beautiful pair, I am envious.

Unfortunately for you, the right ball ornament at the bottom is incomplete which confirms it is a #9 and not a #5 although many other aspects of the stamp look just like a #5. (I have a copy of 7R1L in my collection in the spot for #5 (7R1E) marked as an 'almost' #5).
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
  Replies: 1 / Views: 40Next Topic  
 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.

Go to Top of Page

Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Stamp Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Stamp Community Family - All rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Stamp Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Privacy Policy / Terms of Use    Advertise Here
Stamp Community Forum © 2007 - 2026 Stamp Community Forums
It took 0.14 seconds to lick this stamp. Powered By: Snitz Forums 2000 Version 3.4.05