Stamp Community Family of Web Sites
Thousands of stamps, consistently graded, competitively priced and hundreds of in-depth blog posts to read








Stamp Community Forum
 
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

India Stamps

 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 2 / Views: 2,898Next Topic  
Valued Member
United States
218 Posts
Posted 01/03/2011   8:30 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this topic Add stampdog to your friends list Get a Link to this Message
I had help identifying my first Travancore stamp yesterday. So what did I find today in a pack of miscellaneous stuff, more Travancore stamps along with some other Indian states stamps. Any help on some of the stamps without a state listed, would be greatly appreciated. I looked through the thread done last year on Indian States, but without a name, I get lost.



Send note to Staff

Pillar Of The Community
Australia
3547 Posts
Posted 01/04/2011   03:35 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add tonymacg to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Stampdog, you've turned up a few curly ones. Anyway, running through your stamps row by row:
Row 1: Travancore, Travancore-Cochin, Travancore, Travancore-Cochin
Travancore-Cochin was formed in 1949, by combining the old States of Cochin and Travancore. Travancore had had its own currency, but the new combined State used Indian currency. This meant that the old Travancore stamps had to be surcharged with their equivalent (or near equivalent) values in the Indian currency used by the combined State. You can find combination covers of stamps of the former Cochin State used with these Travancore State stamps surcharged in Indian currency. This is an example (stamps for government use):



Row 2: Travancore-Cochin, Travancore, Travancore, Travancore-Cochin
Row 3: Travancore-Cochin, Travancore-Cochin, Travancore
Rows 4 and 5: Hyderabad
Hyderabad was the largest of the Indian States, and might have been big enough to stand alone as an independent country. It (almost) always felt that it was beneath its dignity to put its name on its stamps. The stamps in row 4 show the monogram of the ruler, the Nizam (who was, at the time, reputedly the richest man in the world). The stamps with the black overprint were Service (= official use) stamps.

As a special concession to Hyderabad, because of its importance, the British allowed Hyderabad Service stamps to be used on official mail to the rest of India, without needing to add British Indian stamps. Here is an example, sent to Bombay, outside Hyderabad territory:




Row 6: Hyderabad, Hyderabad, Gwalior, Gwalior, Gwalior, Patiala
You'll find Gwalior and Patiala listed under the Convention States. In 1885, several States agreed to use British Indian stamps overprinted with the name of the individual State. In return, the stamps were valid for destinations throughout India, unlike non-Convention states. Their stamps were mostly valid only within the State boundaries. Gwalior was the biggest of the Convention States, and one of the biggest of all the States. As a special concession to Gwalior, it was allowed to include its name in Hindi, and to use only Hindi on its Service (official) stamps. This is an example of a Gwalior stamp being used to Sambhar in Jaipur State, and a centre of the salt trade - a destination outside Gwalior



This would not have been possible if Gwalior wasn't a member of the Postal Convention. Jaipur State also issued its own stamps, but the return letter from Sambhar to Gwalior, would have had to use British Indian stamps, because the Jaipur State stamps weren't valid outside Jaipur.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
Australia
3547 Posts
Posted 01/04/2011   07:25 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add tonymacg to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Forgot to mention that there might be a few useful varieties lurking in here. I don't know if Scott lists them, but just in case:

Row 1 stamp 1: From the postmark, I'm assuming this was the last printing of this value. It would be worth checking the perforations: Gibbons lists a perf 12½x11 at £120 used, and a watermark sideways at £25 used. (Before getting too agitated about the watermark if it is sideways, we'd need to be sure your stamp is in fact from the last printing. There's an earlier printing where an upright watermark would be a major discovery.

Row 1 stamp 2: Perf gauge time again: there's a compound perf listed, of any combination of 11, 12, 12½ and 13½, at £24 used.

Row 1 stamp 4: Again, the compound perf is good - £22 used

Row 2 stamp 1: The compound perf is £16 used

Row 2 stamp 4: Perf 14 is £500, and compound perf is £45

Row 3 stamp 1: Need to check the watermark on this. I think it's the Travancore conch shell; there should be one or two on the stamp. Compound perf, this is £14. However, if the watermark is either missing or nondescript bits of a large sheet watermark ... I'll have to resume this lecture later. The cat has gone to sleep on my Gibbons, and she gets very grumpy when her slumbers are disturbed.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
  Previous TopicReplies: 2 / Views: 2,898Next Topic  
 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.

Go to Top of Page

Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Stamp Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Stamp Community Family - All rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Stamp Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Privacy Policy / Terms of Use    Advertise Here
Stamp Community Forum © 2007 - 2026 Stamp Community Forums
It took 0.29 seconds to lick this stamp. Powered By: Snitz Forums 2000 Version 3.4.05