Stamp Community Family of Web Sites
Thousands of stamps, consistently graded, competitively priced and hundreds of in-depth blog posts to read








Stamp Community Forum
 
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

2/6 Australian Jimmy

Previous Page
 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 23 / Views: 8,930Next Topic
Page: of 2
Bedrock Of The Community
Australia
38679 Posts
Posted 01/15/2011   10:40 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add rod222 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Rest in Peace
Canada
5701 Posts
Posted 01/15/2011   10:41 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add BeeSee to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Thanks for the Gibbons clarification Nigel. So the stamp is normal.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
BeeSee in BC
"The Postmark is Mightier than the Stamp"
http://brcstamps.com ---- BNAPS, RPSC, APS
Valued Member
Australia
312 Posts
Posted 01/15/2011   8:31 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add MmmmBalf to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
This is the normal version of the stamp.

The stamp was issued with CofA wmk sideways, with the crown facing the left as viewed from the front of the stamp (so facing to the right when viewed from the rear.)

What SG is referring to is actually an inverted watermark (sideways, as the watermark is sideways ) - the crown faces the right (as viewed from the front.) That means if viewed from the rear, the top of the crown would point to the left. Your stamp the tops of the crowns are pointing to the right, which is normal. When they say to the left, they're not referring to the crown being on the left side of the CofA, but the crown pointing to the left, if that makes sense.

The inverted watermark is ACSC 265a

Balf

Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Be yourself. Everyone else is taken.
Pillar Of The Community
Australia
1865 Posts
Posted 01/16/2011   01:21 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add 22crows to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
There has been an ongoing thread on this stamp with inverted watermarks on the Stampboards site that might further confuse or enlighten you:

http://www.stampboards.com/viewtopi...f=13&t=21381
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
Australia
1251 Posts
Posted 01/16/2011   05:11 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Horamkhet to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Hi to all

I am still totally confused.
Does anyone have a photo of the supposed error watermark. As the crown to me is still left of the COA, I am no authority on stamps, but if someone knows of a picture of the error could they post it and this will solve the mystery. Thanks to all anyway.
Horamakhet
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United Kingdom
3211 Posts
Posted 01/16/2011   05:17 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add nigelc to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Hi Horamkhet,

The error watermark will look like this from the back:



This is Rodney's picture turned through 180 degrees.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
Australia
1251 Posts
Posted 01/16/2011   05:38 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Horamkhet to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Hi
Thanks for that
At least it was a lively discussion
Horamakhet
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Valued Member
Australia
312 Posts
Posted 01/16/2011   05:46 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add MmmmBalf to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Hi Horamkhet,

It's not that the crown is to the left of the CofA, it's that the crown is "pointing" to the left - ie, the top of the crown is to the left. That's the error. If the top of the crown is on the right (looking from the rear,) that's the normal way. All that's happened is they put the sheet of watermarked paper in the wrong way round. This is the same thing that happens with other varieties that have inverted watermarks. It's only confused by the fact that the watermark was sideways with this issue, so when it's inverted it's inverted sideways.

Does that help?

Regards
Balf

Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Be yourself. Everyone else is taken.
Page: of 2 Previous TopicReplies: 23 / Views: 8,930Next Topic  
Previous Page
 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.

Go to Top of Page

Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Stamp Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Stamp Community Family - All rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Stamp Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Privacy Policy / Terms of Use    Advertise Here
Stamp Community Forum © 2007 - 2026 Stamp Community Forums
It took 0.31 seconds to lick this stamp. Powered By: Snitz Forums 2000 Version 3.4.05