Stamp Community Family of Web Sites
Thousands of stamps, consistently graded, competitively priced and hundreds of in-depth blog posts to read








Stamp Community Forum
 
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

Victoria - Identify Postmarks - Help Please

 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 12 / Views: 1,779Next Topic  
Pillar Of The Community
United States
3568 Posts
Posted 04/04/2011   11:13 am  Show Profile Bookmark this topic Add jhlovell to your friends list Get a Link to this Message
I am very sorry but postmarks and the hunt of following the trail of the mail just fascinates me. Being able to tell where or when or why something was mailed renders the stamp just a little more significant. Does anyone have any help with identifying where or when these stamps may have performed their duty (other that the years of production). Any contribution would be gratefully accepted. Thanks - Jeff

Send note to Staff

Bedrock Of The Community
Australia
38679 Posts
Posted 04/04/2011   12:01 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add rod222 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
RHS is a single hammer CDS
very common MELBOURNE station cancel,
with numbers 1 > to at least 24
as yours.

Standard format

"AM
1115
12 10 03"

1115am, 12th October 1903


the left hand one is curious

The middle Balf may have a catalogue of post office numbers.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Edited by rod222 - 04/04/2011 12:01 pm
Pillar Of The Community
United States
7072 Posts
Posted 04/04/2011   12:15 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Cjd to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
244 would be Talbot, which fits the last two visible letters, but doesn't seem to fit the position in the ring?

(The "T" seems too close to the "A" in Victoria.)
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
3568 Posts
Posted 04/04/2011   12:24 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add jhlovell to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
This might be a little clearer

Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Bedrock Of The Community
Australia
38679 Posts
Posted 04/04/2011   10:03 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add rod222 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
I think Talbot fits OK Cj.
You have a Vic postmark cat?
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
3568 Posts
Posted 04/04/2011   10:20 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add jhlovell to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Ok so I think I understand what we have so far. The right hand side, easy enough, the middle we have agreed as Talbot, I guess and still wandering around the desert with the left hand side. Yes??
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
Australia
3547 Posts
Posted 04/05/2011   01:42 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add tonymacg to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
I wonder if the left-hand specimen has some sort of revenue cancel. It doesn't remind me of any postal cancellation I've seen. These stamps were, of course, available for both postage and revenue use.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Bedrock Of The Community
Australia
38679 Posts
Posted 04/05/2011   02:05 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add rod222 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
I don't think so Tony,
it's nagging me, I'm sure I have seen something with "ACCO"
or similar, but the memory wires will just not connect,
It looks barred to me.


I've been through 500 in my database,
and the only divergent killers
are the barred "MC over numeral"

Jeff's could be one of these, mis struck and smudged?



Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Edited by rod222 - 04/05/2011 02:18 am
Pillar Of The Community
Australia
2027 Posts
Posted 04/05/2011   02:35 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add jubilee to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Here's a reference for the difficult one

http://www.prestigephilately.com/ca...&sort_by=lot

There's some nice examples of some MCC's and MCCC's on the first page of lot 348, including MCCC/83, which this one may be
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Edited by jubilee - 04/05/2011 02:38 am
Bedrock Of The Community
Australia
38679 Posts
Posted 04/05/2011   05:22 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add rod222 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Well done Jubilee
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
3568 Posts
Posted 04/05/2011   08:09 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add jhlovell to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
I can't access that website, can someone explain-please?
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Valued Member
Australia
312 Posts
Posted 04/09/2011   12:24 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add MmmmBalf to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
How did I miss this thread?! Haha. Not enough time online.

It's been well answered. Talbot 244 is correct.

There were 2100 barred numerals issued. From 1000 to 1599 they used partial Roman numerals. The thousand and its hundred were in Roman numerals, but the last 2 digits were in normal numerals underneath (except the 1000's, the numeral was beside the M. Eg M67 is 1067.))

So MCCC over 83 is 1383, which was Albert Park.

In 1887 they decided to forget this idea and go with straight numerals again. If a PO had a Roman cancel and had a new one re-issued after 1887, the new one was in straight numerals, so you will still often see numbers between 1000 - 1599, these are just later versions.

The numbers 1000, 1100 etc did not have numerals underneath, and so appear as a straight line M, MC, MCC etc

Balf

Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Be yourself. Everyone else is taken.
Pillar Of The Community
United States
3568 Posts
Posted 04/09/2011   09:12 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add jhlovell to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
thanks balf
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
  Previous TopicReplies: 12 / Views: 1,779Next Topic  
 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.

Go to Top of Page

Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Stamp Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Stamp Community Family - All rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Stamp Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Privacy Policy / Terms of Use    Advertise Here
Stamp Community Forum © 2007 - 2026 Stamp Community Forums
It took 0.23 seconds to lick this stamp. Powered By: Snitz Forums 2000 Version 3.4.05