| Author |
Replies: 12 / Views: 4,268 |
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
Australia
1251 Posts |
|
|
 Hi to all This one was in the "added bonus" from the envelope that I mentioned previously. Has any-one else seen this variety. It is a complete square and sticks out like a sore thumb. It is not listed in Gibbons Regards, Horamakhet
|
|
Send note to Staff
|
| Edited by Horamkhet - 07/17/2011 01:12 am |
|
|
|
|
Bedrock Of The Community
Australia
38679 Posts |
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
Australia
1251 Posts |
|
|
 Hi Rod222 I have posted this scan, it is too square to be a shard of waste? Regards Horamakhet |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Bedrock Of The Community
Australia
38679 Posts |
|
|
In my opinion it must be a shard, it can be a design flaw, or a plate flaw and in either case it is substantiated by having siblings.
Due to the lack of information, or news otherwise then I use the corollory of it being a shard.
Give me the perf size, the paper, any wmk, the date of the stamp, and I look it up in Pocock and give you chapter and verse on the issue.
|
Send note to Staff
|
| Edited by rod222 - 07/20/2011 02:53 am |
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
Australia
898 Posts |
|
|
Horamkhet, I did check used spares for signs of a 'Retouch', nothing in my few. |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
Australia
1251 Posts |
|
|
Hi Rod222 Thanks for the info The perf are about 14, the paper and watermark I can not tell as it still has old backing paper on it. But other I have, have a crown sideways over an A, their paper is thick. The postmark on the this one has only the remains of a double circle, but the others have post dates of 1907-1911 Any information is always appreciated. Regards Horamakhet |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Bedrock Of The Community
Australia
38679 Posts |
|
|
I give up, your perf would suggest a printing by DLR but it looks like a Melbourne printing and Victorians are not known for their workmanship. They should have printed them in Perth.
The Melbourne printings from what I can see are a dog's breakfast noted from what I believe to be a larger dot in the triangular device under "ALI" These were all perf 12 or near to it.
This is a very deep stamp issue and it would take weeks to study it suffice to say the DLR comments in the WA study group book says "De La Rue maintained a high standard and no varieties of a technical interest have been reported" the WcrownA 1d has a broken L in australia at position 2/1
Give me a decent scan of the whole stamp, and measure the printed area of carmine (accurately) in mm
|
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Bedrock Of The Community
Australia
38679 Posts |
|
|
With typography, remember the raised print area holds the ink, any jetsam flying around the print room is going to remain on a sticky surface. Agreed the shape is extraordinary, (it is common to see round white dots from perforation waste) but that's life, you have a square one :)
|
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
Australia
1251 Posts |
|
|
Hi Rod222
Thanks for that
I will see if I can do a better scan on the weekend. The envelope they were in had a pencil inscription, 1d red WA not checked. It is amazing how varied stamps can be
Regards, Horamakhet |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
Australia
1251 Posts |
|
|
  Hi Rod222 I have soaked the item of the paper. It has a Crown and V sideways watermark, as as you assumed it makes it a Victorian printing. The perfs are about 121/2mm. I hope the two scans are helpful From the outer edge to outer edge of carmine, it is 19mm, From the inner edge of octogon shape from the edge near the swans back the square of white is 3mm. From the inner edge facing the swans head the square of white is 10mm in. I hope this is of help Regards Horamakhet |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Bedrock Of The Community
Australia
38679 Posts |
|
|
I wrote a long response, I lost internet connection and lost the lot, I give up.
I'll post again when I am of better humour.
|
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Valued Member
United States
427 Posts |
|
|
Would you say the soaking has improved the overall appearance, even though the dye ran a bit? The stamp looks fresher to me after the soak. |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
Australia
1251 Posts |
|
|
Hi Butterfly
I think so, even though unfortunately the dye ran a bit. Horamakhet |
Send note to Staff
|
|
| |
Replies: 12 / Views: 4,268 |
|