| Author |
Replies: 21 / Views: 3,435 |
|
Valued Member
United States
491 Posts |
|
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
4106 Posts |
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
2547 Posts |
|
|
Jan, it is a Type IV (Scott 9) recut twice on the top but I am not sure about the bottom from this scan (appears recut once on bottom?). The left side of the portrait oval show what may be a double transfer. Could you post a higher resolution scan? |
Send note to Staff
|
| Edited by Russ - 07/21/2011 5:34 pm |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
491 Posts |
|
|
I would love to get your further input, but I don't really know how to improve resolution. I tried using the image optimizer in the posting software ... this is what I can get:  Is that ok? If not, can you tell me what I need to do? I have an all-in-one type printer/fax/scanner and it's relatively new so I am not very handy with it. |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
Canada
2277 Posts |
|
|
Jan-- Congrats on reaching the over 50 post club. Not that there isn't other options for scans but what I find the easiest is scanning at minimum 600x600dpi (should be drop down menu on the scan page ) and use photobucket to host the image. Advantage of photobucket is you can maitain the high file size and reduce the file size on your personal files. Photobucket will generate an image code automatically that you simply paste in your messages here . I copied your original and bumped the size up . I enjoy learning about this issue so hope this helps .  |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Valued Member
United States
491 Posts |
|
|
Thank you, nitrolures - both for the 50 post shout-out and for the re-scan.
Can Russ (or anyone) confirm Russ's original thought on the stamp:
"Jan, it is a Type IV (Scott 9) recut twice on the top but I am not sure about the bottom from this scan (appears recut once on bottom?). The left side of the portrait oval show what may be a double transfer."
I am not too sure what recut means: is that a ref. to the darker lines over POSTAGE in the center of the oval? If so, it looks to me like there is one on the outer rim below ONE CENT??
As for double transfer, I can't begin to guess.
Are any of these really bad news?
Thanks, as ever. |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
Australia
1658 Posts |
|
|
G'Day Jan and welcome to the forum
Has any one got back to you on your stamp
have you read about why stamps get re-cut ?
also you need to be a sort of an expert at I.Ding Franklin's, so I suggest Stampvirgin this would be the bloke you need. |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
7097 Posts |
|
|
*bump* I want to see what this is too as I'm also currently into I.D.-ing these too. |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
4106 Posts |
|
|
I believe it is a #9 Plate 1 late, as all #9's come from this plate. It is recut once at the top and the bottom. This looks like it is re-cut twice at the bottom, if so, it would be a rarer version. Becuase of the possible double recut on the bottom I would send it to bill weiss. The following is an excerpt from slingshotvenus plating website: Quote:
Plate 1 Late This plate is unique among 1ยข plates. As plate one in it's original state began to show wear, the printers decided to extend the life of the plate by employing the original transfer roll and re-entering each and every position, thus strengthening the design. As the top and bottom outer curved lines were still not strong enough, each line that needed strenngthening was recut by hand. All but one of the 200 positions received this attention. This lone stamp is Position 4R1L, a Type II. The remaining positions are all Type IV. This reworked plate is refered to as Plate One in the late state or simply Plate One Late.
The Recutting of the Curved Outer Lines
Type IV (Scott No. 9) stamps have re-cutting of one of the four curved lines at either the top or the bottom of the design. All type IV stamps have either the top or bottom line re-cut or both of them re-cut. Stamps that have either the top or bottom inner lines re-cut will always also have an outer line re-cut. There are seven different combinations available, all produced from from plate 1 in it's late state. Stamps with double re-cuts (two lines at the top or bottom) are more rare than stamps with only one line re-cut at the top or bottom or both. Knowledge of this aspect is important for several reasons: to know if a stamp is recut in order to determine if it is indeed a Type IV and differentiate it from other types, to be able to collect at least one of the seven different recut varieties. And for the more advanced collector, to have the capability to plate the stamps and thus reconstruct and re-assemble the complete pane and plate.
|
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
4106 Posts |
|
|
btw... Russ and others are MUCH better at identifying these then I am. Though I thank you for the vote of confidence. |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
4106 Posts |
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
2555 Posts |
|
|
The stamp is without question a type IV, scott #9. It appears to have been recut twice at top and once at bottom. There are only four such combinations on Plate 1L. This stamp does not appear to be any of those positions. So, the verdict.... the stamp is a #9 and the image is too poor to say anymore.
|
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
1518 Posts |
|
|
Echo the welcome back to Harry! And thanks for the beautiful scan! associated data. |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Valued Member
United States
491 Posts |
|
|
I apologize to all who were watching and learning from this thread -- somehow I managed to miss the last few posts (actually, now I think, I was on vacation the second week of August, so that is probably how I dropped the ball). Here is a new scan of the stamp, with 600 DPI resolution. I would love to know if this enables the experts to tell more about the stamp. Recap (I've cut out the bits where everyone requested a better scan): Russ: Type IV (Scott 9) recut twice on the top but I am not sure about the bottom from this scan (appears recut once on bottom?). The left side of the portrait oval show what may be a double transfer. stampvirgin: I believe it is a #9 Plate 1 late, as all #9's come from this plate. It is recut once at the top and the bottom. This looks like it is re-cut twice at the bottom, if so, it would be a rarer version. sinclair2010: The stamp is without question a type IV, scott #9. It appears to have been recut twice at top and once at bottom. There are only four such combinations on Plate 1L. This stamp does not appear to be any of those positions. EDIT: If a scan of a specific part would be useful, I would happily try. Thank you!  |
Send note to Staff
|
| Edited by JanS - 09/10/2011 04:13 am |
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
2555 Posts |
|
|
Jan, a 1200 dpi scan is really what is required to work on any of the 1c stamps. It appears to be recut twice at top and once at bottom yet the four positions with that recut combination don't match your stamp. What that means is it is probably not recut the way it appears and only a better scan will tell. |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
4106 Posts |
|
Replies: 21 / Views: 3,435 |
|