Quote:
Puzzler I don't get how you know the i.d. of the bidder . . .
I looked at the original lister's completed listings, the ones for $0.11 and then at the bidders for those auctions.
Member Id: o***1 ( 8 ) US $0.11
Member Id: e***o ( 65311) US $0.06
Member Id: s***a ( 1527) US $0.03
Starting Price US $0.01
The same e***p was in a few bidder lists. Then, looking at the original lister's feedback I saw one with 65,311 feedback and a name that had the letters e and o in it somewhere (letters can be reversed also) and voila,
Mr cellphoneforever buying a tiffany stamp one or two times (how many does one need?), and of course he gave great feedback.
This great feedback is, on second thought, meant to cover up some of the bad feedback he gets.
Then I clicked on this guy's name (e***o) in the above bidders list and saw that he spends 60% of his time the last month bidding on his friends auctions (and most likely visa versa also).
It is harder now to pinpoint someone and their name with the Member ID's encrypted like they are but these guys Did want to leave feedback so it was easier.
It is good to be transparent like this I think. Shows up what you can be doing.
Look at his (e***o)'s
30-Day Summary
Total bids: 2053
Items bid on: 1973
Bid activity (%) with this seller: 61%
and this guy sells cel phones too so he must be a busy little beaver, don't you think, to have time to bid on 0.01 stamps over and over?
I noticed one winner of one auction gave negative feedback because he didn't even receive his stamp. So, possibly they don't even have any to start with, since they are using a picture taken from the USPS web site it looks like, or a USPS publication (with the denomination on the stamp crossed out).
Something else to look for when cruising through someone's feedback, hard to spot, is the tone used. The original lister of the stamp (the wallet seller) when responding to neutral or negative feedback hardly ever acknowledges the fault is his for selling an item not up to snuff, it is mostly always blamed on the buyer for not emailing and talking to them (to allow you to talk to them and let them convince you the wallets are real leather). Although no mention is made of what would or could happen whenever you decided to do that and not just move on to more promising pastures.
Sometimes you just gotta fold 'em folks. The cards ain't no good. You lost your money. Time to move on.
I could be wrong here, as they do have positive feedback, but this is perhaps also people who don't like to rattle the bushes and see what comes out (most of us). But, maybe they realised that for the price they paid they got what they paid for? Some feedback seems to indicate that.
I don't want to put down or disrespect any honest sellers out there, and there are lots of them. You can get a deal on
ebay but I think it's more realistic to think that you can get what you pay for on
ebay, good and bad and in between.
So the major dishonest thing these guys are doing is trying to cover up bad feedback with good but false feedback that is very hard to prove is false. Selling bad goods and not getting their shipping done is a bad thing to be doing if they want to continue and be Bill Gates or something.
When I first saw this trick (selling Canada stamps) I thought is was just advertising to get people to look and then to click through to their other listings. But now I see it is all probably a cover up for selling less-than-good goods.
Read feedback, it's easier than ever to read the bad news as well as the good now. Click on the bad numbers in the summary box. Look for that tone thing I mentioned. Do they sound sorry or not? Are they going to fix their customer's problems or not? What are they up to, if anything?
No reason to not be helpful and courteous and businesslike at all times. Especially when the chips are down.
Remember that when you buy a nice item, sometimes you end up disappointed also. That's life.