Stamp Community Family of Web Sites
Thousands of stamps, consistently graded, competitively priced and hundreds of in-depth blog posts to read








Stamp Community Forum
 
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

Quiz Time: Is This A Legit R3B?

 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 13 / Views: 1,719Next Topic  
Pillar Of The Community
United States
6432 Posts
Posted 10/07/2011   12:13 am  Show Profile Check revenuecollector's eBay Listings Bookmark this topic Add revenuecollector to your friends list Get a Link to this Message
Quiz time. Looking at the stamp below, taking into consideration the margins, color, impression, cancel date, etc., would you consider this to be a legitimate R3b?

If so, why?

If no, why not?

Send note to Staff

Pillar Of The Community
United States
2948 Posts
Posted 10/07/2011   01:02 am  Show Profile Check Rileysan's eBay Listings Bookmark this reply Add Rileysan to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
I'm not a student of revenues, but from what I can see in the Scott specialized catalogue, this stamp looks authentic. However, I would guess that the date on the manuscript may tell another story, but what that is, I cannot say.

Brian
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Bedrock Of The Community
United States
12128 Posts
Posted 10/07/2011   01:17 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add wt1 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
I would agree with Rileysan (I'm not a student of revenues, either). Curiously, although it has nothing to do with the stamp, the date of the manuscript cancel is November 19, 1863, which is the same date as Lincoln's Gettysburg Address.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
1721 Posts
Posted 10/07/2011   07:44 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add revstampman to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
margins...Good
color...on my screen looks a little dark. But could also be age.
impression...Looks a little worn. But still plausable
cancel date...Good, but I would expect it to be a little earlier than Nov. (could have been sitting in someone's desk.)

What type of paper?
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
5894 Posts
Posted 10/07/2011   08:42 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add smauggie to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
There is something strange in the texture of the inking. I am going to say not legitimate but based mostly on a hunch that the impression on the paper just doesn't look right for a 150+ yr old stamp.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Rest in Peace
United States
1225 Posts
Posted 10/07/2011   10:49 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add artlaunier to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
"The 1st lot of stamps of any value or title delivered to the Government by the contractors was on Sept 27, 1862, and consisted of 1 cent and 2 cent Proprietary stamps." "The first paper used was a very hard, brittle, and close grained wove paper."

(The Boston Book, 1899)

Your copy dated Nov 19, 1862 is a very early date or was back dated.

The only thing I see that might be invalid are the perforations. Could it be that one side is reperfered in as they don't line up?

Art
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed. (The exact & entire wording of the 2nd Amendment to the U.S. Constitution)
Pillar Of The Community
United States
6432 Posts
Posted 10/07/2011   11:12 am  Show Profile Check revenuecollector's eBay Listings Bookmark this reply Add revenuecollector to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Art,

I think you misread the cancel date. It's 1863, not 1862. Even if it were 1862, this wouldn't be considered too early. I have 1st issue revenues on document as early as the first week of October 1862.

Nothing wrong with the texture or ink.

I'll keep the question open a while longer...
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
1721 Posts
Posted 10/07/2011   9:08 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add revstampman to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
After now looking at it with full attention I would have to say FAKE! a nice stamp but still a fake. The answer can be found in the top left corner margin.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
6432 Posts
Posted 10/07/2011   9:26 pm  Show Profile Check revenuecollector's eBay Listings Bookmark this reply Add revenuecollector to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply

Quote:
The answer can be found in the top left corner margin.


Elaborate please.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Bedrock Of The Community
United States
12128 Posts
Posted 10/07/2011   9:30 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add wt1 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Perhaps evidence of a tear/repair (red highlight)? Or a perforation that doesn't quite seem to match the opposite side (yellow highlights)?

Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Edited by wt1 - 10/07/2011 9:37 pm
Pillar Of The Community
Canada
2277 Posts
Posted 10/07/2011   9:42 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add nitrolures to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Is that a silk strand rather than evidence of a tear?
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Custom designed fishing lures no matter what you fish for!
Www.Nitrolures.Com
Pillar Of The Community
United States
6432 Posts
Posted 10/07/2011   10:02 pm  Show Profile Check revenuecollector's eBay Listings Bookmark this reply Add revenuecollector to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply

Quote:
Is that a silk strand rather than evidence of a tear?


It cannot be a silk strand on a revenue that early. The silk paper was not introduced until 1870.

At any rate, keep going folks. It's interesting to see people's opinions. :)
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
1721 Posts
Posted 10/08/2011   12:41 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add revstampman to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply

Quote:

It cannot be a silk strand on a revenue that early. The silk paper was not introduced until 1870.


That sure looks like a silk thread in the top left making it a R3d. Correct in that they were not issues untill 1870. But that does not mean it was not back dated. Perf's also don't match up. they appear to be off by about .5mm
This is why I wouldnt't buy a stamp like that without it in my hands for examination
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
6432 Posts
Posted 10/08/2011   01:21 am  Show Profile Check revenuecollector's eBay Listings Bookmark this reply Add revenuecollector to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Answer posted in my new acquisitions thread (just posted).
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
  Previous TopicReplies: 13 / Views: 1,719Next Topic  
 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.

Go to Top of Page

Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Stamp Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Stamp Community Family - All rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Stamp Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Privacy Policy / Terms of Use    Advertise Here
Stamp Community Forum © 2007 - 2026 Stamp Community Forums
It took 0.28 seconds to lick this stamp. Powered By: Snitz Forums 2000 Version 3.4.05