| Author |
Replies: 17 / Views: 3,359 |
|
Valued Member
71 Posts |
|
|
Dear All. This has been puzzled me, I have no idea what is the Scott catalog number for these 2 stamps. Any guru here can help ? Thanks A Lot ! 
|
|
Send note to Staff
|
| Edited by ken11 - 10/09/2011 9:47 pm |
|
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
6756 Posts |
|
|
Not New Zealand, but Great Britain.
In the Scott catalog, stamp at right is Great Britain #212 (note the solid background).
Stamp at left has horizontal lines as background, and will either be #161 (watermark 33) or #189 (watermark 35). I suspect it is one of the color varieties of #161. You will need to check the watermark and the color shade. There are also other varieties of these stamps that are not listed in Scott, but are listed in Stanley Gibbons. |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Bedrock Of The Community
Australia
38679 Posts |
|
|
Hi Ken, welcome to the family, Please consider to try and change your thread title to something like GB:KG5 definitive so other students can learn here :) Hope you enjoy your stay.
|
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Valued Member
71 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock Of The Community
Australia
38679 Posts |
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
6756 Posts |
|
|
Quote: mistakes are OK in this family Unless Rod makes them. Then, we are all obligated to jump all over him. Sort of a family tradition.  |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Valued Member
71 Posts |
|
|
For a newbie like me to Identify the early GB stamps are challenging , the US stamp even worse. You guys will see me posting "HELP TOPIC" from time to time. Thanks in advance. |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
6756 Posts |
|
|
Post your stamps/questions any time. There are many here who are capable and more than willing to help. You can not only ask for IDs, but also feel free to ask for pointers in how to ID them stamps. And Rod always seems to have the perfect picture or two to help illustrate some of the replies.  k |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Bedrock Of The Community
Australia
38679 Posts |
|
|
Yes, I just supply the images, khj supplies the sage advice, and the intelligent humour :)
|
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Valued Member
71 Posts |
|
|
lot of watermarks can't be seen by naked eyes, What is the best tool or equipment to check the watermark ? |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Bedrock Of The Community
Australia
38679 Posts |
|
|
Quite often Ken, holding the stamp with tongs, over a black surface will do the trick, or again, hold near a light and introduce differing angles to your eyes will bring the wmk into view.
If soaking, water will certainly or perhaps "ronsonol" lighter fluid I have seen espoused on this newsgroup, safety caveats apply of course, using inflammable liquid.
|
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Valued Member
71 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock Of The Community
Australia
38679 Posts |
|
|
Ken, hit "reply to topic" hit the little red arrow shown in this image then PASTE your copied quote IN BETWEEN the quotes hope that helps Ken.  |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
3568 Posts |
|
|
well I know that it helped me, cause I did not know how to do it. Thanks Rod! |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
Canada
669 Posts |
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
6756 Posts |
|
|
Quote: then PASTE your copied quote IN BETWEEN the quotes
Or, if you aren't nimble with the mouse/touchpad or you hate trying to move the cursor and click at the right spot between the quote tags... if you just opened up a new reply window, you can paste the copied quote first, then select all (CNTL A), and then click on the quote icon. That will automatically put the quote tags around the copied quote. Works not only here, but in some (not all) other software as well. |
Send note to Staff
|
|
Replies: 17 / Views: 3,359 |
|