Stamp Community Family of Web Sites
Thousands of stamps, consistently graded, competitively priced and hundreds of in-depth blog posts to read








Stamp Community Forum
 
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

German States : Hanover : Forgery.

 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 14 / Views: 3,183Next Topic  
Bedrock Of The Community
Australia
38679 Posts
Posted 10/19/2011   09:14 am  Show Profile Bookmark this topic Add rod222 to your friends list Get a Link to this Message
King George V

10 groschen olive-green

1st March 1861
Typographed : Senator Culemann Hanover.
New Currency
Rose Gum
No watermark
Imperf





Send note to Staff
Edited by rod222 - 10/20/2011 01:15 am

Pillar Of The Community
United States
2948 Posts
Posted 10/19/2011   2:14 pm  Show Profile Check Rileysan's eBay Listings Bookmark this reply Add Rileysan to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Since no one else has commented, I will! 1) Great stamp! I don't think I have any of the 10G variety, only 1s and 2s and 2) Is this the British King George V, or another? If he is British, what was the relationship between England and Hannover?
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United Kingdom
3211 Posts
Posted 10/19/2011   3:05 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add nigelc to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
This is King George V of Hanover, grandson of King George III of the UK (and of Hanover).

His father became King of Hanover when Queen Victoria ascended the British throne because the Salic law in Hanover didn't permit her as a woman to inherit the Hanoverian throne.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Nigel
Edited by nigelc - 10/19/2011 3:06 pm
Pillar Of The Community
United States
2948 Posts
Posted 10/19/2011   3:12 pm  Show Profile Check Rileysan's eBay Listings Bookmark this reply Add Rileysan to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Thus, my confusion. Thank you!
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
2333 Posts
Posted 10/19/2011   3:36 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Cursus to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
George I Great Elector (ruler) of Hannover, Northern Germany, became king of Britain early XVIII centuty, at the death of Queen Ann. So the protestant branch of the Stuart House became extinct. Not so the catholic Stuarts, who claimed the Bristish throne for a while: The Old Pretender, Bonnie Prince Charles and so on...
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Bedrock Of The Community
Australia
38679 Posts
Posted 10/19/2011   8:03 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add rod222 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Thanks for comments, guys,
I must admit, I am a bit rusty on that history.

I am surprised, given the name on the stamps,
that English dropped an "N" in Hanover.

I was expecting someone to scream "forgery"
especially at GBP500, I expect is so, of course.

----------------------------------------
rulers of england

1660 - Stuarts Restored

Charles II (1660-1685)
James II (1685-1688)

1688 - The Bloodless Revolution (or The Glorious Revolution)

William (of Orange) and Mary (1689-1702)
Anne (1702-1714)


Hanovers (George I-Victoria) (1714-1901)

George I (1714-1727)
George II (1727-1760)
George III (1760-1820)
George IV (1820-1830)
William IV (1830-1837)
Victoria (1837-1901)


Saxe-Coburg-Gotha (Edward VII) (1901-1910)
Edward VII (1901-1910)



Windsors (George V-Elizabeth II)
In 1917 George V changed the name Wettin, the family name of Prince Albert, to Windsor

George V (1910-1936)
Edward VIII (1936)
George VI (1936-1952)
Elizabeth II (1952- )
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Edited by rod222 - 10/19/2011 8:12 pm
Pillar Of The Community
United States
2948 Posts
Posted 10/19/2011   8:14 pm  Show Profile Check Rileysan's eBay Listings Bookmark this reply Add Rileysan to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply

Quote:
I was expecting someone to scream "forgery"


The day ain't over yet!

If noone has given a satisfactory answer, I will look it up in my club's library this Saturday. We have the complete German Philatelic Society series on German states forgeries.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
1160 Posts
Posted 10/19/2011   8:45 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add PoStat4evR to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Forgery or not, still an interesting item!
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Bedrock Of The Community
Australia
38679 Posts
Posted 10/19/2011   8:50 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add rod222 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Thanks Guys,
what a supportive community :)
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
1721 Posts
Posted 10/19/2011   9:23 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add revstampman to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Ahh! The imfamous Mi. 18 this is possibly the most highly forged stamp of the German States!

Not a Sperati forgery nor a Fournier
But a forgery none the less. Tip off the Original has no frame line.
But, keep going Rod I'm rooting for you to find one that is an original!
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
6661 Posts
Posted 10/19/2011   9:25 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add stallzer to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Rod, you've given me an idea for a new thread, hope it hasn't been done yet.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
Australia
2156 Posts
Posted 10/20/2011   01:31 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add jimjamtwo to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
If the cancel is genuine. that is to say, if this stamp was postally used, it may well be worth more than the genuine article.

'Falschungen zum Schaden der Post,' as they put it in the Michel catalogue, are often worth thousands of Euros.

Unfortunately, my Michel Specialised does not give a 'Falschungen zum Schaden der Post' listing for this stamp.

Forgeries aimed at collectors are, of course, an entirely different matter and in such cases the cancel is the crucial factor.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Edited by jimjamtwo - 10/20/2011 01:36 am
Pillar Of The Community
United States
1721 Posts
Posted 10/20/2011   08:53 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add revstampman to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply

Quote:
If the cancel is genuine. that is to say, if this stamp was postally used, it may well be worth more than the genuine article.


Actually this is quite true! Many Postal forgeries are worth quite a bit!

Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
3568 Posts
Posted 10/20/2011   11:34 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add jhlovell to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Great stories, love them all. Real or not!
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
Canada
1084 Posts
Posted 10/20/2011   12:40 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add cynical to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
These threads on German states have revived my interest in my German stamps even given the forgeries. For Scott followers - am I right in thinking this is Hanover Scott#24. Interestingly, my old Scott catalogue makes no mention of forgeries in the Hanover category. I also lived for a time near Hanover, Ontario, Canada.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
  Previous TopicReplies: 14 / Views: 3,183Next Topic  
 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.

Go to Top of Page

Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Stamp Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Stamp Community Family - All rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Stamp Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Privacy Policy / Terms of Use    Advertise Here
Stamp Community Forum © 2007 - 2026 Stamp Community Forums
It took 0.33 seconds to lick this stamp. Powered By: Snitz Forums 2000 Version 3.4.05