| Author |
Replies: 10 / Views: 2,750 |
|
|
Valued Member
372 Posts |
|
|
Is it possible that the darker stamp here is a 375b (lake)? It's perf 12 with a single line watermark. The stamp on the right is certified as a regular 375 (carmine). Is the 375b even known used? I didn't see any used 375b stamps on the Philatelic Foundation searchable database. I'm sure there's some of the experts out here who know the history of this stamp - thanks in advance! Matt 
|
|
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
Australia
1251 Posts |
|
|
  Hi matttodd1 and all others This stamp also confuses me, there are so many colour variations. These are just some I have tried to sort into the varying colours. Maybe some-one out there should print a colour chart just for this issue. Regards Horamakhet |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
987 Posts |
|
|
Horamakhet I too have about 200 and can't tell one from the other so I just threw them all in a bag as a give away for someone just starting to collect stamps. The same with the Green I cent stamps that all look alike. I figure I'll put a couple of each shade in each bag of stamps I give away to get rid of them. Of course I've kept a few of each shade also in case I should ever get so bored I would want to sit down and study or try to sort/figure them out. I honestly don't think that is ever going to happen though. |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
Canada
2277 Posts |
|
|
Not sure about the actual issue being know used or not but if right side is certified carmine (and definatly scans as carmine) The left is more than just a deep carmine. Lake is a touchy color especially since it usually jumps values up so high. Be interesting to see what others have to say. |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
1947 Posts |
|
|
I think William Weiss gives an opinion at a very reasonable cost. You might google him and check his fees. |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Valued Member
372 Posts |
|
|
Thanks for the comments so far. As near as I can tell, the 375b was printed using the ink intended for the postage due issues in use at the time.
I have sent things to Bill in the past for a quick opinion. In this case I might send it straight to the Philatelic Foundation for their opinion.
Matt |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Valued Member
372 Posts |
|
|
Thanks for the comments so far. As near as I can tell, the 375b was printed using the ink intended for the postage due issues in use at the time.
I have sent things to Bill in the past for a quick opinion. In this case I might send it straight to the Philatelic Foundation for their opinion.
Matt |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
7097 Posts |
|
|
Tin man That's pretty much exactly what I been doing for months now, everyday for 6+ hours a day and find it fascinating but still very trying and still learning. It must take years of study to be able to spot certain ones. I am getting good at spotting the offsets and the flat plate from rotary but all the type-ing is frustrating but I'd still be happy to get into another pile! I am just now getting ready to pop open a baggie full of the 2˘ Washington's from the years 1923-31. Much easier but fun just the same. |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Valued Member
372 Posts |
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
1179 Posts |
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
1179 Posts |
|
|
As for the history, "Through an error at the Bureau of Engraving and Printing a small quantity of these stamps (375) were printed from Lake colored ink of the same shade as the Postage Due stamps, it is an extremely rare shade."
The quote appears in the second paragraph, top page 190, "THE STAMPS OF THE 20th CENTURY 1901-1922", Volume I - Revised; Max G. Johl; copyright 1937; H.L. Lindquist, N.Y.
Hope that helps.
Hal
|
Send note to Staff
|
|
| |
Replies: 10 / Views: 2,750 |
|