Quote:
... In England cleaning means cleaning and it reduces the stamp's value to zero. It is not acceptable under any circumstances ...
And this from the home of Antiques Roadshow where, in almost every episode, there is some owner of some collectible who is advised that filling a crack, replacing missing veneer, finding that 4th wheel, etc, will greatly improve the value of that piece at auction.
Coin/medal/etc & stamp/cover/etc collecting are the only collectibles fields (of which I am aware) that follow the rules of archaeology ... but, wait! ... even archaeologists will reassemble (GLUE!) a broken vase, scrape flesh residue off of bones, re-assemble a wall from a pile of rocks ...
Why dirt, mold, mildew, stains, etc, would become sacred at the moment that a stamp/cover/etc passes into our hands is beyond me.
The Sistine Chapel can be restored (RE-PAINTED), but mold on a stamp of the Sistine Chapel cannot be brushed, peroxide'd, or otherwise touched by human hands. Discuss.
And, while I'm ranting, how about this little disconnect:
When selecting an album for our little treasures, we insist on paper that is acid-free, archival-grade, museum-quality.
But when a stamp comes along pre-glued to a piece of paper that has been produced under unknown, unknowable, and often atrocious 19th Century paper-milling technology, we'd all rather soak the skin off of our bones than soak that stamp off of that cover.
What would George Carlin have made of that?
Cheers,
/s/ ikeyPikey, who cannot bear to remove a stamp from its vehicle.