| Author |
Replies: 25 / Views: 4,702 |
|
Pillar Of The Community
Australia
1042 Posts |
|
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
6661 Posts |
|
|
Yes, they are all 65's. The 2nd one looks like it could be a #65 Rose / Pink. |
Send note to Staff
|
| Edited by stallzer - 05/19/2012 06:17 am |
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
Australia
1042 Posts |
|
|
The colour variations in these 1861 issued stamps is incredible. I would have sworn that the 1st one would be something else. By Rose Pink do you mean the 2nd could actually be a 64B? |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
2480 Posts |
|
|
Can you post a scan of the back of the first stamp? It looks to me like it has a grill. |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
Australia
1042 Posts |
|
|
Hi sorry can't scan the back as it is part of a cover, see image below. Thanks Duncan  |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
2480 Posts |
|
|
The stamp definitely has a grill and is probably Scott 94 (red or rose red) but I can't count the points from the image provided.
|
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Valued Member
United States
293 Posts |
|
|
I agree with Tom on that first one and that second looks to have pinkisk hue, but the date of use would be off for a pink color. Of course a late use of the stamp could be possible. |
Send note to Staff
|
| Edited by sirruspoe - 05/19/2012 08:36 am |
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
Australia
1042 Posts |
|
|
I Think I Count faint points about 18 on the top of his head and I mean really faint and you have to look on a certain angle. I cannot see under the CDs if there were more. There is definately a grill but hard to see, even under the magnifier! I compared to the others they don't have grills this 1st stamp does. Are we sure it could be #94? Not #88? |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
Australia
1042 Posts |
|
|
The cover is clearly dated 1868 here. The colour is definately miles different to the other $65's I have. And now that Tom spotted it I am leaning toward the Rose Red Colour (I know there are 55 variations). To bad the Grill is so faint. Stallzer commented that the 2nd stamp maybe Pink Rose. Scott #64 3-cent Washington Pink, #64b Rose Pink and #65 Rose. From the three stated colors how can one determine the age old color difference, i.e., is the Washington Pink lighter or darker than the Rose Pink, is the Rose darker in colour from the others? Scott #88 & Scott #94 how can you really be sure if you have E or F Grill if you have 15 - 17 points? These stamps are a real challenge to properly ID.
|
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
2480 Posts |
|
|
Quote: Are we sure it could be #94? Not #88? No we're not. It could be either. Or it could be 82, 83, 85 or 85C. The determining factor is the size of the grill. Unfortunately, on a faint grill like yours, the only way to know for sure would be to remove the stamp from the cover. https://goscf.com/t/14828#14828[EDIT: I forgot the 82.] |
Send note to Staff
|
| Edited by tomiseksj - 05/19/2012 09:03 am |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
293 Posts |
|
|
This series of stamps are one of my favorites and I spend way too much time and money on them. I love them though and take all I can get.
The pink colors are basically an expert challenge as they are hard to determine. You could look at hundreds and hundreds and never see a true "pink", but the fun is in looking. The color variations are huge for this stamp from the first issue to the last.
I have been messing with these and still have all kinds of trouble with them. On the grill size you would need to measure the grill in mm to determine the final say on the size of the grill. Points are kind of a backup of sorts to me after measurement, but I'm learning and could be wrong on that.
Thanks for posting these as I love looking at them. |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
Australia
1042 Posts |
|
|
I will sleep on the thought of removing the stamp off the cover tomorrow. It maybe only selling for $5 in the end on a cover anyway. So I may have to just remove it. Good night all will check back for comments tomorrow. Here is hoping it could be an 85C but I doubt previous collectors would have over looked a stamp that valuable. Knowing my luck it is probably a $3 valued stamp. |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
6661 Posts |
|
|
Sorry, meant Rose/ Red. Very difficult to tell fom a scan but the 2nd and 3rd look to be the same shade. |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
Australia
1042 Posts |
|
|
I am still deciding if it is worth to steam off the stamp. What should the back look like if it has a grill? Can any one post some examples of backs for 82, 83, 85, 85C 88 & 94? Also how about the stain damage top right, would this not reduce the stamp value in any case? |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
2555 Posts |
|
|
Before you remove the stamp you could try using thin aluminum foil. The cheaper stuff is usually much thinner. Press it onto the stamp and see if the grill impression shows through and makes is easier to count the points. I have never done it but it might work. It is done for some other things.
I have found the best way to count grill points is to shine light on the stamp at an oblique angle in a darkened room. The key is to eliminate all light other than that coming from a low angle. Try it. |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
2480 Posts |
|
|
Here is a C grill (Scott 83) -- I can't show the back because it is on cover.  Here is front and back of an E grill (Scott 88).  Here is an F grill (Scott 94).  |
Send note to Staff
|
|
Replies: 25 / Views: 4,702 |
|