| Author |
Replies: 12 / Views: 2,241 |
|
|
Valued Member
26 Posts |
|
|
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
7097 Posts |
|
|
These are Back Of Book U.S. Internal Revenue stamps and an essay for a private carrier stamp. Interesting stuff.
Carrier stamp (with the Eagle on it) is listed as LO1 but since this is an essay I don't think the numbers are correct
Revenue stamps are #1. R1c - 1˘ Express- red #2. R6c - 2˘ Bank Check- orange #3. R24c - 5˘ Certificate- red |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
7097 Posts |
|
|
Actually that Scott # of LO1 isn't even the same issue I don't believe? Someone will know it's relatively common and thousands of these were reprinted for some reason so I am very unclear on it's number. I apologize and I do believe that the rest are to be correctly I.D.'d. |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Valued Member
26 Posts |
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
Canada
6525 Posts |
|
|
Scott's Specialized (I love this book!) has the American Letter Mail Co. listed as 5L1 issued in 1844 in black. The footnote says this stamp has been extensively reprinted in several colours, distinguishable by the rust marks on the plate, which were mostly removed from the margins and gutters betwen stamps but remain within the stamp designs. That's a quote. Not sure it that means the coloured versions were reprinted by someone else? and are therefore copies, or were later printings by the American Letter Mail Co. The books also gives background info. 'Lysander Spooner established this independent mail line operating to and from New York, Philadelphia and Boston.' |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Valued Member
26 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
169 Posts |
|
|
It's a color reprint from the 1942 APS convention. If I get time later this afternoon I'll fire up the scanner and show all the sheetlet colors from the show. Correct, you can see the rusty plates in the colored version reprints and the clean plates in the originals.
Kurt |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Valued Member
26 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
169 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
169 Posts |
|
|
This might help a little, too. These are only 100 dpi (I think I might re-scan them later to clarify) but you should be able to see the difference between the original 1844 version (in black) and the later reprints (orange) which have pitting and plate damage on them, especially on the left side.   They are digitally clipped from the SAME ten plate positions in the middle section of the sheetlet. Kurt |
Send note to Staff
|
| Edited by klange - 07/18/2012 4:43 pm |
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
7097 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
26 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
169 Posts |
|
|
Just a little more info on these with some better scans. These are higher quality scans and I split them into rows so I didn't have to downgrade the quality to post them. - row 1 genuine: row 1 reprint: - row 2 genuine: row 2 reprint: - row 3 genuine: row 3 reprint: - row 4 genuine: row 4 reprint: I think with these better scans you can see the graininess, pitting, and rusty plates on the reprints that is missing from the originals. |
Send note to Staff
|
|
| |
Replies: 12 / Views: 2,241 |
|