| Author |
Replies: 0 / Views: 3,914 |
|
Moderator

United States
5094 Posts |
|
|
Just found this item in my collection. Is there any significance to the "Night Air Mail" indication? If so, it appears that Day Air Mail added Night Air Mail on some significant date, no? 
|
|
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
|
|
Moderator

United States
5094 Posts |
|
|
As a follow-up, can you help tell me the Type or Scott Number? I'm leaning towards Type IV but I find it difficult to tell for sure.  |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
Canada
6525 Posts |
|
|
Don't know anything about it, but very interesting none the less. Especially with what look to be a block of imperf. Washingtons. Terrific event cancel too. This cover has lots going for it. Considering the sun must have been rising at 7 am in August in San Francisco, I wonder if they had to hold on to this until sundown? |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
Guatemala
1500 Posts |
|
|
A larger scann of just one or two stamps is needed to help id the type. |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Bedrock Of The Community
United States
12128 Posts |
|
|
Moderator

United States
5094 Posts |
|
|
Thanks Wt1 ... tons of good information. A larger scan of the lower two stamps is shown below.  Just the Left Stamp.  |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
2361 Posts |
|
|
Long ago, the editors of the American Air Mail Catalog decided not to list "night air mail" first flights, because many had not been properly documented, and the catalogs would have ballooned in size. Therefore, it is a category much less researched than standard covers, and even now, there are many new discoveries each year.
Edward Worden is a famous name in aerophilately; you will find his name on many FDCs of the first six airmails, #C1-C6, and in many other aspects of air mail collecting too. |
Send note to Staff
|
| Edited by doug2222 - 09/22/2012 11:38 pm |
|
|
Moderator

United States
5094 Posts |
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
2361 Posts |
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
Guatemala
1500 Posts |
|
|
It is a tough one since these have many features of a type IV. The leaves on the center left are very much a type IV as well as the left numeral 2 . The vertical lines in the ribbons, however are much stronger than average descriptions of a type IV. If you have not already done so, check this website: http://1847usa.com/washfrank/2cT4_7...ypesMain.htm |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
2547 Posts |
|
|
I believe it is Type V. Toga rope and button are not Type IV Left 2 is not Type VI Nose is not Type VA Upper lip is not Type VII |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
2547 Posts |
|
|
Moderator

United States
5094 Posts |
|
|
I did some more higher resolution pictures of various areas of some of the stamps. I would have to agree that it is a Type V. Left Laurel of Upper Right Stamp:  Ribbon of Lower Left Stamp:  The only confusing thing is that I do see a "D" in the Lower Right Stamp:  Taken all together, I eliminate everything except Types IV and V but lean toward a type V. |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
Guatemala
1500 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock Of The Community
United States
12128 Posts |
|
|
Referring to the Domestic Air Mail Rates section within the Introduction pages of the Scott Specialized Catalog for US Stamps, covering the date in question, it states: Quote: 1919, July 18 - June 29, 1924 No specific airmial rate: mail carried by airplane on space available basis but airmail service not guaranteed, per 1 oz.....................................................2c Postal cards and postcards, per 1 oz...........1c |
Send note to Staff
|
| Edited by wt1 - 09/23/2012 5:00 pm |
|
|
Moderator

United States
5094 Posts |
|
|
I had a Washington / Franklin "Expert" look it over. He tried, but could not find a watermark while on the cover. Based on the toga rope and button, he concluded a Type 1 which would make it Scott 482. Seems odd that a stamp issued 1916 to 1917 would be kept around for this flight, when later Imperfs from 1918 to 1920 were available. Not the greatest news, but at least I now know. |
Send note to Staff
|
|
Replies: 0 / Views: 3,914 |
|