Stamp Community Family of Web Sites
Thousands of stamps, consistently graded, competitively priced and hundreds of in-depth blog posts to read








Stamp Community Forum
 
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

Rare 1875 Washington 3 Cent Scott 169 A46A? Please Help ID

 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 3 / Views: 7,718Next Topic  
Valued Member

United States
294 Posts
Posted 10/31/2012   4:21 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this topic Add UFOAirMail to your friends list Get a Link to this Message
Gang I thinkkkk,I may have found a rare 1875 Washington 3 cent scott a46a
What do you think about the shading?
In Scotts it says upper part of the upper tail of the left ribbon is heavily shaded..have a look at these 2 stamps here,,isnt the one on left heavily shaded in comparision to the other?













Send note to Staff

Pillar Of The Community
United States
6661 Posts
Posted 10/31/2012   4:37 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add stallzer to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
I feel bad having to keep doing this to you. Again, very common stamps with a retail value of around .025˘. The ribbon shading is referred to as the "Secret Mark" as the companies that printed the Stamp could tell who it was printed by as they used the same die.

"In 1873, the contract for the printing of U.S. postage stamps was awarded to the Continental Bank Note Company. At that time, Continental took over some of the dies and plates used by the National Bank Note Company who had held the previous contract. In order to establish whether certain stamps had been printed by National or Continental, "secret" marks were added to many, if not all of the plates used to produce the Continental Bank Note stamps." Copied from 1847 USA
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Bedrock Of The Community
United States
12128 Posts
Posted 10/31/2012   4:42 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add wt1 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
It's highly unlikely to be a 169 ... did you read the five paragraphs of copy below the catalog listing? I won't recite it all but some of the issues:

...although perforated, these stamps were usually cut apart with scissors...perforations are often much mutilated and the design is frequently damaged.

...paper is very white instead of yellowish.

...Only No. 169 is documented on cover (unique, postmarked, March 5, 1876). Is there a date attached to your example?

And as Stallzer said, the secret mark is the dead giveaway as to why this can't be a 169.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Edited by wt1 - 10/31/2012 4:45 pm
Valued Member
United States
294 Posts
Posted 10/31/2012   5:05 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add UFOAirMail to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Thanks guys anyways had to ask,,aint getting hopes so very very high anymore but just had to ask on this one..,I am still a bit confused becuase the 2 stamps are totally different down there by ribbon arnt they,,shading differences here are very easy to see..whys this?
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
  Previous TopicReplies: 3 / Views: 7,718Next Topic  
 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.

Go to Top of Page

Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Stamp Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Stamp Community Family - All rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Stamp Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Privacy Policy / Terms of Use    Advertise Here
Stamp Community Forum © 2007 - 2026 Stamp Community Forums
It took 0.25 seconds to lick this stamp. Powered By: Snitz Forums 2000 Version 3.4.05