| Author |
Replies: 39 / Views: 5,337 |
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
527 Posts |
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
6756 Posts |
|
|
Quote: ...and the only fault is a fake cancel. Quote: A fake cancel is not a fault, it's an alteration. I guess I misunderstood your original post. Thank you for your clarification. My opinion remains the same -- I consider a fake cancel a fault. There's nothing wrong with having different standards/definitions, so long as we understand each other. When a seller tells me a used stamp is sound, I expect the cancel to be genuine. I readily accept that not everybody uses the same standard or definitions, which is why it's always good to know your seller. Anyway, this is getting the thread sidetracked, and I apologize to everyone for that. I'm still interested in reading the opinions of others regarding this stamp. I promise not to post any responses.  k |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
6756 Posts |
|
|
That was kind and trusting of you to post the link, Lpmiller.
Definitely a nice looking stamp. The pic is going into my reference files.
Thanks! |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Bedrock Of The Community
United States
10599 Posts |
|
|
The right side has been reperforated, it does not match up with the other three sides. I have a strong suspicion that the right margin might have been added, if you look carefully there is a shadow running vertically on both sides of the scan, especially noticeable on the upper half of the stamp but it's on the bottom as well. I might be wrong, and even if true it is possible that the seller does not know the stamp has been repaired, although he knows about the cancel so I wonder. This stamp is severely overpriced, 10% of his asking price is probably more like it's value based on this scan. |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
527 Posts |
|
|
Yeah, khj, that's my dilemma. Sure is nice looking. Don't think I'll ever be able to touch one again for that price. Have to admit though that I'm not too crazy about buying off a seller in Rome. May have to pass on this one. |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Rest in Peace
Canada
5701 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock Of The Community
United States
10599 Posts |
|
|
From a scan it is very difficult unless it's a well known fake. Usually an expert can tell that color and/or "look" are wrong (too shiny, or too dull, or raised ink from a laser printer, or something else), and putting the stamp under UV will usually show it, because most modern (almost all 20th century) inks will fluoresce and the contemporary inks of that era will not. |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Valued Member
372 Posts |
|
|
This is always a tough one. I don't know that I would ever really be able to own a well centered, genuine used sound example. I settled on one that is sound and well centered, even if the cert says "no opinion" with respect to the cancel. Matt  |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Bedrock Of The Community
United States
10599 Posts |
|
|
Alas, 75 to 100 years ago 19th century ink was still available at times, so sometimes it is simply impossible to know the answer. This stamp was always scarce used, and there have been dishonest people around stamps practically from the beginning, so there is no way to know when a fake cancel might have been created. And of course this one might well be genuine. |
Send note to Staff
|
| Edited by revcollector - 02/27/2013 11:06 pm |
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
1947 Posts |
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
7097 Posts |
|
|
I would pass on this if I was you. Like stated above (several times) it has always been a sought after stamp, and since it's more valuable used that opens the door to fakes and alterations. Counterfeiting and fakes of that have been around as long as that stamp has, and the only way to truly be absolutely positive about a genuinely used Scott #39 would be to have one on cover with a known and well documented cancellation and a valid and accredited certification saying so. Ultimately it's your call but I suggest not. All the best -ILS |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Bedrock Of The Community
United States
10599 Posts |
|
|
I agree about passing on this, but I do think that there are certified off cover examples that are genuine. They have much clearer cancels than either of these stamps do. |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
2948 Posts |
|
|
I agree with the consensus. Pass on it.
The stamp is uncommon, not rare unused (no gum). I frequently see sound, unused copies sell for under $500. I purchased a certified unused copy for less than $400 a couple years ago.
Best of luck!
Brian |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
1106 Posts |
|
|
I've been looking at 39's for a while but haven't pulled the trigger yet. I don't know how much "street cred" The Swedish Tiger has, but according to his website: http://www.theswedishtiger.com/39-scotts.htmlonly 180 cancellations are certified genuine. On the other hand, most 90 cent stamps were used for mail to Europe. Coming from Italy may be a plus? How lucky do you feel?  Dan  |
Send note to Staff
|
Experienced stamps need a home too. I'd rather have an example that is imperfect than no example. I collect for enjoyment, not investment. APS Member #223433 Postmark Collectors Club Member #6333 Meter Stamp Society Member #1409 |
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
1179 Posts |
|
|
I woiuldn't touch it - period. Faked is faked - No matter that the stamp is real. A faked marking on it makes it worthless. P.T. Barnum was correct. |
Send note to Staff
|
|
Replies: 39 / Views: 5,337 |
|