This is a hypothetical question. As some of you may remember, I spotted a #39 on
ebay that the seller had properly identified as one with a fake cancellation. Apparently someone in the past had attempted to jack up the CV of this stamp by adding the fraudulent postal mark since properly cancelled #39 are rarer and more costly than mint/unused varieties. Sage advise from SCF readers called my attention to the fact that this item also had repair work on both sides. As a result, I passed this one by. Since then I've seen several others on
ebay that likewise have been advertised as having a fake cancellation. Here is the ethical dilemma, that I've questions about. If such stamps do have a fake cancellation, and the fake can be successfully and professionally removed, would/should this allow the owners to properly categorize their stamps as "unused, no gum"? Of course, any collector with even a shred of ethics should regard the removal of an "official" cancellation as egregious to say the least. However, in this case, as the cancellation was fraudulent to begin with, it would seem that removal of the fake cancellation would return the stamp to the original and legal condition. As outspoken as many of you are, this should provide some powerful meat for discussion. Look forward to hearing your take on this conundrum.