| Author |
Replies: 17 / Views: 4,366 |
|
Valued Member
United States
56 Posts |
|
|
I am not a stamp grading expert but I like what I see on this Columbian $5... welcome opinions on grade.  
|
|
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
|
|
Moderator

United States
12330 Posts |
|
|
The some of those perfs look odd to me, but I am no expert. Does it have a cert? |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
1566 Posts |
|
|
It would grade near the lowest at FINE. Stamps that are more than slightly off center to the point that the frame of the design almost touches the perforation holes should be listed a Fine (F). There are 6 grades that are used. Superb, Xtra Fine, Very Fine, Fine-Very-Fine, Fine and Average.
Possible gun disturbance. Since it is a high value stamp the going price will still be nice but not as much as a better stamp. I have seen this stamp in this condition go for around $960 in the past year. |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
6661 Posts |
|
|
Quote: It would grade near the lowest at FINE Agree to a point. Scotts does not list a lower grade than Fine but I thought there was also "Good". Scotts lists Fine as "Perfs barely clearing the design" and this one has perfs that clearly cut into the design. |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community

United States
1267 Posts |
|
|
Not sure about the bottom perfs. Look a bit suspect. Looking at the scan of the back, is there a thin under the $5?  |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Bedrock Of The Community
United States
10586 Posts |
|
|
Even though the bottom perfs look funky, it's entirely possible that they are genuine. I have been fortunate enough to have seen sheets of some values, and funky perfs do occur occasionally. They would have to be looked at in person. |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
517 Posts |
|
|
Scotts does list lower than Fine. Its VG(Very Good) but its actually an AVG.(Average). The perfs aren't bad. |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
527 Posts |
|
|
If that were mine,it would be the "finest" stamp in my collection.  Being that about 95% of all collectors don't have a copy of this stamp, it's easy to "arm chair quarterback". If you can afford it, and you like it,who cares what grade someone say's it is. If you are buying to sell, send it to a grader and live with the opinion of said grader. A few years ago a fellow collector made a comment on my used "Cattle in the Storm" he said "too bad it's a straight edge" I replied, well show me your example.... er um , well he did not have one.  |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
1566 Posts |
|
|
Fred not one person said a bad thing about this stamp. The OP asked for a grade on this stamp. Like it or not it grades low period. That however does not make it a poor or bad stamp. Grading stamps is not a hard process because the standards are the standards it is that simple.
Unfortunately and I don't necessary like this but the grading helps determine the value of a stamp.
So no arm chair quarterbacking just a fair honest opinion on the question he asked, I am certainly not going to call this a great representative of this stamp and call it a Superb.
Personally unless there is suspected re-gumming, thin or something else there would be no added benefit in sending this stamp in for a grade. It certainly would fit in my collection just the way it is if I didn't have a better centered one.. |
Send note to Staff
|
| Edited by mkfarm - 10/22/2013 10:55 pm |
|
|
Bedrock Of The Community
United States
10586 Posts |
|
|
Calling it as it is is not "armchair quarterbacking". It's describing the stamp in philatelically acceptable terms. That is what the original request was for. Liking it is all well and good, but there is a specific value range for this specific stamp in this specific quality. At auction this stamp would probably bring between 20% and 25% of catalog, assuming it is sound. If damaged less; if regummed it would catalog a lot less so the 20% would be much less. |
Send note to Staff
|
| Edited by revcollector - 10/22/2013 11:08 pm |
|
|
Valued Member
213 Posts |
|
|
Have you view under a UV light for any repairs ? If you look at the bottom engraving under Columbus there seems to be a thin? , tear or adherence of something to the left of that line . May be dust in the scan ? A grade of good to fine in my opinion . By the same token a nice stamp over a 100 years old ... well preserved considering the age alone .
|
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Bedrock Of The Community
United States
10586 Posts |
|
|
It also might have a pressed out crease running horizontally just under the numerals through Columbus' forehead. |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Valued Member
United States
11 Posts |
|
|
I would not touch that stamp without a cert. Way too many fakes out there including some old ones that look very much like the real thing. |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Valued Member
United States
56 Posts |
|
|
All, I appreciate the feedback and I have learned much from your responses. I have sent the collection (three full sets) of Columbus stamps to an expert to get opinion on grade, submitted to TPG and/or auction. If we decide to have the stamp graded, I will let you know the results. Thanks again! |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
1849 Posts |
|
|
Quote: submitted to TPG and/or auction What is TPG??? Never heard of them. Please note....there is a difference in GRADING and EXPERTIZING. Grading is going to take into account centering, faults, etc....and assign a numerical grade from 5-100. Expertizing is going to list the faults on the certificate and NOT supply a # grade. Two different things |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
New Member
1 Posts |
|
|
Picture of rear of stamp tells me nothing. Need a better description to give an honest grade. Can't tell if it has original gum or thins. Unfortunately, a $5.00 Columbian demands respect in all grades. *** Edited by Staff - Please Review the rules that you agreed to when you registered. *** |
Send note to Staff
|
| Edited by SheldonTheStampMan - 11/02/2013 6:50 pm |
|
Replies: 17 / Views: 4,366 |
|