The 2 cent circs also exhibit die 9 varieties similar to those on the 3 cent.
Head size (9.25 v 8.75); hair meeting bust in different ways; shape of the numerals; length of crossbar in the G; middle bar in E of STATES (one centered, one high); . . .
While I agree that we should not let die wear cause us to add pseudo-varieties to the catalog, the differences between these two examples have nothing to do with die wear.
I have a hard time seeing how they could be working dies from the same master, but I suppose that is possible.
I wonder what the ERP database can tell us about this?
The ERP database seems to indicate that the large head die was in use at the beginning of die 9's run, as I didn't see any small heads on database entries on 1929 paper (with the caveat that not all images in the database had the resolution to do a proper identification).
This non-scientific survey would seem to bear out Bill's position that one die was early and the other was later.
It still remains to be shown that the small head die exists as a worn version of the original large head die. I'm of the opinion that it is not. But, the whole process of going from master die to hob die to working die is complicated enough to yield just about any verdict.
I'll see your worn plate/late state and raise you mine! (sorry it's a little askew, but I scanned it with other stamps and am too lazy to scan it again)
Looks like just another vinyl working die variety of die 1. The vinyl plates wore quickly and produced an untold number of unlisted (deservedly so) varieties. A few of these varieties were mistakenly listed at one time but have since been deleted. See my book: Collector's Guide to (the) Circular Dies, the Washington-Franklins of U.S. Postal Stationery
Ah, thanks! I was more confused about the way it looked than the die number I guess. Have a fair amount of these, and just started to organize them. This was one of those "one of these is not like the others" cut square. It's just... large I guess on the lettering. Hadn't come across any others, but thanks for letting me know it's common!
Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Stamp Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Stamp Community Family - All rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Stamp Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited. Privacy Policy / Terms of UseAdvertise Here