Stamp Community Family of Web Sites
Thousands of stamps, consistently graded, competitively priced and hundreds of in-depth blog posts to read








Stamp Community Forum
 
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

Scott #2187-D 1990 40 Cent Chennault Without Tagging ??

 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 2 / Views: 1,962Next Topic  
Valued Member
United States
55 Posts
Posted 08/03/2014   1:04 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this topic Add Jay Smith to your friends list Get a Link to this Message
In working through a huge (really huge, as in cubic meters) postage lot, we have been checking the tagging on everything, usually with out any surprises.

However, we seem to have found a lower-left (side) full plate (#1) strip of 20 without any sign of tagging under a good short-wave UV light. The gum is "dull" (i.e. invisibile),

With a Scott value of $250 per stamp for #2187d, I want to be sure I have gotten this correct.

I am surprised that searching on Google (and ebay) has not found any examples for sale. I did find one Cherrystone lot that claimed to have a single in it along with some unrelated untagged stamps -- an odd mix, but perhaps thus why it went unsold.

Questions:

- Does anybody maintain any census or sales records on the Great Americans series varieties such as this?

- Which expertising service would be the most appropriate for such a variety? Is one more well known (or respected) than another for their expertise on the Great Americans?

- Assuming it all checks out, the next step is tricky. If it really is as rare as the catalog value and searching suggests, then it would be a shame to break this up. But, if sold as the unit of 20 stamps, it would probably go for quite a bit less than if broken down somewhat. At the same, time, I am sure that items such as even singles of this have a limited market (always a problem with a variety that is what you can't see instead of what you can see). Once divided, there is certainly no pasting it back together! I welcome any thoughts regarding this condundrum.

Jay
Send note to Staff

Pillar Of The Community
United States
4079 Posts
Posted 08/03/2014   8:51 pm  Show Profile Check eyeonwall's eBay Listings Bookmark this reply Add eyeonwall to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
"without any sign of tagging under a good short-wave UV light"

Were you looking with a magnifier (in a dark room)? - iuntagged errors have to pass such a test just like missing color ewrrors and I find most "untagged errors" are really only close but no cigar.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
Learn More...
United States
1493 Posts
Posted 08/03/2014   10:22 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add JLLebbert to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Since the plate # is 1, the tagging (if present) should be overall (2187). The other dull gum version (2187a) only has plate #2. In fact, all of the other Chennault versions have plate #2.
I have seen most of the Great American "tagging omitted" issues offered for sale on ebay or via auction, with a few exceptions. The exceptions are Gallaudet (1861), Flanagan (2171), Marin (2173), Howe (2174) & Chennault (2187).
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Edited by JLLebbert - 08/03/2014 10:32 pm
  Previous TopicReplies: 2 / Views: 1,962Next Topic  
 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.

Go to Top of Page

Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Stamp Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Stamp Community Family - All rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Stamp Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Privacy Policy / Terms of Use    Advertise Here
Stamp Community Forum © 2007 - 2026 Stamp Community Forums
It took 0.16 seconds to lick this stamp. Powered By: Snitz Forums 2000 Version 3.4.05