Stamp Community Family of Web Sites
Thousands of stamps, consistently graded, competitively priced and hundreds of in-depth blog posts to read








Stamp Community Forum
 
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

Help With Scott #450??

 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 11 / Views: 2,149Next Topic  
Valued Member
United States
240 Posts
Posted 08/28/2014   10:38 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this topic Add Gar to your friends list Get a Link to this Message
Hello all, This is a perf 10 rotary coil,I think. Single line watermark. Does it look like a scott#450? Thanks, Gary



Send note to Staff
Edited by Gar - 08/28/2014 10:41 pm

Pillar Of The Community
United States
1756 Posts
Posted 08/28/2014   11:57 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add disi123 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Hi, Gary... from the size of your image, it's a little
difficult to see Type III (if it is III)... the truth
lies in the number of lines in the ribbons, right and left...

From the back, it's difficult to tell whether the carmine
is either setoff or a bleed-through of the frame from the
obverse...

If it's setoff, then your stamp would be a 442 Flat
Plate Type I...

Randall
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Rest in Peace
United States
763 Posts
Posted 08/29/2014   12:06 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Bill Weiss to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
It is a rotary coil, which is apparent because of the fuzzy appearance due to poorly wiped plate. Also the color shade is wrong for a flat plate 2c. It appears to be a 450 as stated by Gary, and if it has a watermark, it must be either 449 or 450.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Valued Member
United States
240 Posts
Posted 08/29/2014   12:10 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Gar to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
It has a single line water mark. When I measured it against my flat plate cutout ,it is larger. Whats throwing me off is the ink on the back. I do appreciate the help gentlemen. Respectfully, Gary
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Valued Member
United States
240 Posts
Posted 08/29/2014   12:25 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Gar to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
It has the characteristics of the 449, but I leaned towards the 450, but the ribbons, lip, toga rope and especially the lines on the sideburn are all there for the type 1 #449. I guess maybe I should send it your way Mr. Weiss.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Valued Member
United States
27 Posts
Posted 08/29/2014   06:08 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Kim Possible to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
I agree based on this scan that the characteristics look like type I.

I would also like to see a better scan. Maybe it's just the fuzziness Bill noted or my tired eyes, but I see very faint outlines where the additional type III ribbon lines would be.

Kim
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Rest in Peace
United States
763 Posts
Posted 08/29/2014   09:59 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Bill Weiss to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
I blew the picture up in photoshop and I can clearly see two ribbon lines indicating Type III (#450 if it has a watermark).
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Valued Member
United States
240 Posts
Posted 08/29/2014   4:27 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Gar to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Where are the 2 lines in the ribbons? Is that what they reference as an I and V? I must be getting old I can't see them. Gary

Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Edited by Gar - 08/29/2014 4:29 pm
Valued Member
United States
27 Posts
Posted 08/30/2014   12:21 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Kim Possible to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Gary, I barely see the lines on your first image and don't really see them on the second. It's likely more a problem with the scans than your eyes.

I think you know where to look, they're just not very evident. The 3 lines on the left (including shading) are sometimes referred to as IV. I marked it up on your scan. I also included the line on the right ribbon that's not showing up very well.





Kim
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
1756 Posts
Posted 08/30/2014   12:35 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add disi123 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Kim... that was very interesting what you did with the lines...
what software did you use to do that...

Randall
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Valued Member
United States
240 Posts
Posted 08/30/2014   04:13 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Gar to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Your right. I'm not getting old.lol Should have looked at the dang stamp instead of the scan. I much appreciate the help out here. Thank you. Like Randall said, that's a neat software. Respectfully, Gary
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Valued Member
United States
27 Posts
Posted 08/30/2014   3:38 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Kim Possible to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
I wish I could say it's some cool new app on my tablet. Instead I switch to my computer and use image editing software. In this case I zoomed way in and used the pencil tool.

Kim
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
  Previous TopicReplies: 11 / Views: 2,149Next Topic  
 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.

Go to Top of Page

Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Stamp Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Stamp Community Family - All rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Stamp Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Privacy Policy / Terms of Use    Advertise Here
Stamp Community Forum © 2007 - 2026 Stamp Community Forums
It took 0.31 seconds to lick this stamp. Powered By: Snitz Forums 2000 Version 3.4.05