Stamp Community Family of Web Sites
Thousands of stamps, consistently graded, competitively priced and hundreds of in-depth blog posts to read








Stamp Community Forum
 
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

Scott 1041, 1041B, And 1042. Did I Get These Right?

Previous Page
 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 22 / Views: 12,306Next Topic
Page: of 2
Pillar Of The Community
Learn More...
United States
1493 Posts
Posted 03/01/2015   8:32 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add JLLebbert to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
IBFS: Yes, the difference does appear rather dramatic. But the ratio of the two heights is about what one should expect. I zoomed in until the stamps were approximately 5 times the specified height. I then carefully measured the heights of the two stamps on the screen with a metric ruler. What I got was 106mm vs. 105mm ... the difference ... 1mm ... 5 times the 0.2mm of the actual stamps. So while the apparent difference might appear too great to be correct, math tells me otherwise. I do agree, though, that the apparent difference appears a bit more than a single line of engraving. That remains true just looking at the stamps with no magnification. Unfortunately, I only have the single used copy of 1041 with which to make comparisons. Maybe I'll invest in a couple of plate blocks & take a closer look at them. I do need a mint copy of 1041 anyway. Thought I had one & was quite surprised to find that I did not.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Edited by JLLebbert - 03/01/2015 8:33 pm
Bedrock Of The Community
United States
12128 Posts
Posted 03/02/2015   10:49 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add wt1 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
I thought I'd try my hand at attempting to identify the 1041 and 1041B varieties from my stockbook. Although these aren't the greatest examples, do you think I have identified them correctly?

Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
Learn More...
United States
1493 Posts
Posted 03/02/2015   4:21 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add JLLebbert to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
They look correct to me.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
1545 Posts
Posted 03/02/2015   6:19 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add I Brake For Stamps to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Then I'm confused about what Scott says, and whether or not I have the right stamps.


-IBFS
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
All science is either Physics or Stamp Collecting. -- Ernest Rutherford
Pillar Of The Community
Learn More...
United States
3046 Posts
Posted 03/02/2015   6:27 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add apastuszak to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
What I find strange is that Scott identifies the design as being 22.7 vs 22.9 mm. I don't know if a .2 mm change would be visible to the naked eye easily. Now, from the pics people have posted, the overall size of the stamp seems to be taller, and I think it's taller than just a 0.2mm difference. I wonder why they didn't use the overall dimensions of the stamp for identification.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Free Ukrainian Stamp Album and modified Mystic Stamp Album Pages - http://www.stamphacks.com
Ukrainian Philatelic and Numismatic Society Member #1212: http://www.upns.org
Eire Philatelic Association Member #2869: http://www.eirephilatelicassoc.org/
Pillar Of The Community
Learn More...
United States
3046 Posts
Posted 03/07/2015   10:47 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add apastuszak to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Ok...

Went back to the stamp store. The owner had 1041 and 1041B stamps, which he had identified by breaking up plate blocks. We took my stamp and stacked it up against a 1041 and 1041B. The stamp was the exact same size as a 1041. So, then I bought a 1041B off of him, and we put the two side by side. Sure enough, you can spot the difference with the naked eye.

Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Free Ukrainian Stamp Album and modified Mystic Stamp Album Pages - http://www.stamphacks.com
Ukrainian Philatelic and Numismatic Society Member #1212: http://www.upns.org
Eire Philatelic Association Member #2869: http://www.eirephilatelicassoc.org/
Pillar Of The Community
3859 Posts
Posted 03/07/2015   12:08 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add jogil to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
When one stamp is wet flat plate printed and the other is wet rotary press printed, then it is easier to tell them apart by design measurement differences. However, this becomes much more difficult such as for the above stamps when one stamp is dry flat plate printed and the other is dry rotary press printed.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Edited by jogil - 03/07/2015 12:09 pm
Page: of 2 Previous TopicReplies: 22 / Views: 12,306Next Topic  
Previous Page
 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.

Go to Top of Page

Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Stamp Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Stamp Community Family - All rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Stamp Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Privacy Policy / Terms of Use    Advertise Here
Stamp Community Forum © 2007 - 2026 Stamp Community Forums
It took 0.23 seconds to lick this stamp. Powered By: Snitz Forums 2000 Version 3.4.05