| Author |
 Replies: 25 / Views: 3,697 |
|
Valued Member
United States
293 Posts |
|
|
|
|
Valued Member
United States
293 Posts |
|
|
Another note on this stamp the paper is very thick and stiff .When I compared it to other ones this stands out all by it self. |
Send note to Staff 
|
|
|
Valued Member
United States
293 Posts |
|
|
Another note There is what looks like a red line but it seems to be part of the paper not drawn in on the out side like a pen or pencil it is in the fiber of the stamp paper.When I look at it closely under my loop at the stronger magnification you can see it in the fibers below the surface from the perfs. I'm stumped as I am a rookie at this kind of Identifying. |
|
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
1849 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
293 Posts |
|
|
Could this be coil waste .The red line looks like the frame work from a Carmine pink or rose but it is not a deep red or lake. |
|
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Valued Member
United States
293 Posts |
|
|
No it is not re-gummed. There there is no gum on the back just the paper And a spot in the center where it was stuck on what ever it came off of. |
|
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
937 Posts |
|
|
It looks like it still has part of the envelope/whatever still stuck to the back of it. How about a rear scan? |
|
Send note to Staff
|
Ryan = HDNAC = DNA = HDC = Hysterical DNA Collector = Historical DNA Collector = me who just loves stamps :) |
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
1614 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
293 Posts |
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
1849 Posts |
|
|
all the light "stuff" you see over-hanging the perf
tips/top of stamp is gum....
I am willing to bet....after a good soaking/bath....
they disappear. |
|
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
937 Posts |
|
|
Kevin,
Up for another "Avatar Challenge" bet? |
|
Send note to Staff
|
Ryan = HDNAC = DNA = HDC = Hysterical DNA Collector = Historical DNA Collector = me who just loves stamps :) |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
293 Posts |
|
|
Re soaked and there was some kind of blank stamp stuck to the back with a red line. It had perfs. So that explains the thickness question. And the red line.
It was another stamp stuck to the back.
So could we say that this was perforated with some kind of stamp paper on the back. |
|
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
1849 Posts |
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
1951 Posts |
|
|
Looks nothing like the previous scan. Much better and no longer looks like a fake. Even the left margin looks OK. Not sure about the re=gum. I would like to see a scan after the soaking.
Jack Kelley |
|
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
1271 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
293 Posts |
|
|
I am having a problem up loading scans to this sight, When I try and enlarge the scan .I dont know how to save it after I enlarge the scan. Any help with this would be very helpful.  |
|
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Replies: 25 / Views: 3,697 |
|
Posted 09/05/2015 6:22 pm
