I prefer stockbooks, because I reorganize constantly

The way I do it with the stamps I collect more "in-depth" is, I sort them by catalog number, which looks like this:

In this case, no album is ever complete. Every nice cancel is another addition to the collection, so there are literally billions of stamps out there to collect

Other areas, where I'm not interested in color variants and such, I only keep one of each and arrange them by sets, which saves a lot of space and then looks like this:

In this case I consider the album as complete, the moment I have every stamp that's in the catalog once.
But as said before, it's up to you how you like it.
I know people who don't sort their stamps at all, they just hinge them on pages the order they receive them.
I like to easiely find certain stamps and "get rid" of doubles I don't need, so I arrange them by catalog number.
Quote:
I have lots of albums and want to know if I should keep them the way they are or re-do it my way.
I would say re-do them your way. But then again, I don't know the "history" of the albums. I have one stockbook I got from my grandfather (the chess one, for those who remember) that I left the way it was and I'm not going to change it.
If I receive stockbooks or albums maybe from
ebay or similar, I don't hesitate to rearrange them. I don't have any personal connection to them - but I want to "integrate" them in my collection and to do so, I have to re-do them my way.