Stamp Community Family of Web Sites
Thousands of stamps, consistently graded, competitively priced and hundreds of in-depth blog posts to read








Stamp Community Forum
 
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

Scotts #64 Lower Right Sheet With Salvage On Lower Left

 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 6 / Views: 1,751Next Topic  
Valued Member
United States
176 Posts
Posted 04/15/2016   11:52 am  Show Profile Bookmark this topic Add Dale Kramer to your friends list Get a Link to this Message
Haven't posted anything in a long time. Found this this morning and it puzzles me. Looks like a lower right sheet corner stamp with salvage on lower left hand corner of stamp. Don't understand the salvage on the lower left hand corner?????? Any explanation is appreciated!

Send note to Staff

Pillar Of The Community
6329 Posts
Posted 04/15/2016   12:25 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add John Becker to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Very likely part of the next stamp to the left, thus badly damaged.
(And Scott 65 rather than 64)

Believing in simple explanations, I will suggest a theory that the user poorly scissor-cut the sheet for ease of use. They barely missed the perforations horizontally and vertically leaving some of the next stamp (perhaps cutting several sheets together with a lower sheet slightly misaligned) as they cut the sheet into strips then each long cut strip into singles. Later some of those narrow parts of the next stamp were removed.

As a test I cut up a small piece of a sheet, missing the perforations in both directions, then removed some of the extra. It created your stamp quite well.





Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Edited by John Becker - 04/15/2016 12:42 pm
Valued Member
United States
176 Posts
Posted 04/15/2016   1:37 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Dale Kramer to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Very good, now I know. valid explanation.
Thank you.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
6329 Posts
Posted 04/15/2016   1:41 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add John Becker to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
That is my best guess. Others may have different thinking. Your mileage may vary!
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
1807 Posts
Posted 04/15/2016   3:16 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add dudley to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Undoubtedly this is the case. The stamp is centered strongly to the NW, leaving lots of space between the design and the perfs along the right and bottom. The bit of attachment at left is part of the right margin of the stamp that was adjacent to the left. Maybe the user had trouble separating the stamps at the perforations and tore into the stamp to the left of the one pictured, and in chagrin grabbed for the scissors. Use of scissors to separate the first US perforated stamps (1857 issue) is not uncommon, but by 1861 it would have to be considered unusual.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
1348 Posts
Posted 04/15/2016   8:34 pm  Show Profile Check ray.mac's eBay Listings Bookmark this reply Add ray.mac to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Actually have a 64 that was certed w a straight edge, and posted it here about 5 years ago. Cert was definitely incorrect and sent it back and corrected to say perfs cut off on bottom...Definitely no straight edges on this issue.....Ray
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
2226 Posts
Posted 04/16/2016   12:45 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Classic Coins to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply

Quote:
(And Scott 65 rather than 64)


Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
  Previous TopicReplies: 6 / Views: 1,751Next Topic  
 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.

Go to Top of Page

Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Stamp Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Stamp Community Family - All rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Stamp Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Privacy Policy / Terms of Use    Advertise Here
Stamp Community Forum © 2007 - 2026 Stamp Community Forums
It took 0.3 seconds to lick this stamp. Powered By: Snitz Forums 2000 Version 3.4.05