| Author |
Replies: 16 / Views: 16,332 |
|
Valued Member
United States
7 Posts |
|
|
Can anyone help with identifying these stamps? Are they rare? I was thinking the first one is a rare type, with the fine hair in middle of head (I was reading about how to identify a bit)  I count 12 vert. and 11 horizontal - aren't most 10 or 11 x 11 perf.(holes)? These are all attached to old addressed envelopes, not loose.  *** Moved by Staff to a more appropriate forum. ***
|
|
Send note to Staff
|
| Edited by GmanStamp - 05/06/2017 01:42 am |
|
|
|
|
Valued Member
United States
122 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
7 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
122 Posts |
|
|
I'm new, so someone else would have to help you with identification. However, here's some advice I received when I posted a similar topic to yours: Quote: To address your "best practices" request. One needs the basic tools and proficiency of them: Scott US Specialized catalog, perforation gauge, tongs, watermark tray and fluid. And patience.
That said, the Washington/Franklin series still challenges fairly advanced collectors. It is deeper water to swim in than other eras.
— https://goscf.com/t/54173#472215Here's the Scott's catalog I have: http://www.scottonline.com/2018-uni...l-1-listings |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Valued Member
United States
122 Posts |
|
|
The first stamp is design "Washington A157" and there are about 50 variations listed in the Scott catalog, and only a handful of those listings are rare/valuable—it would be hard for anybody to tell by the image… |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Valued Member
United States
122 Posts |
|
|
The second stamp is design "Washington A129" and has a bunch of Scott listings like the first. This design has multiple types which are differentiated by watermark amongst other indicators—so, like the first, it would be hard for anybody to tell by the image…
That being said, I wouldn't be surprised if someone here could provide more information at first glance. |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Moderator

United States
12330 Posts |
|
|
This site will help you http://www.stampsmarter.com/1847usa...ntifier.htmlNeither stamp is rare. (Very, very small chance that the first one could be a rare variety but this is hard to determine without stamp in hand. Chances are lower than winning a lottery.) But leave the stamps on the covers, they may be worth more than just the stamps themselves. Would like to see images of the entire covers. Don |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
|
Valued Member
United States
7 Posts |
|
|
Here are the stamps on the envelopes. I think the first stamp is a 634A Type 2, from looking / studying other stamps in that type. Would a company that certifies stamps certify one that is attached to an envelope, or does it have to be loose / free of envelope? This stamp should be certified, or not? The special delivery 10 cent stamp is not too valuable is it? Anyone have a price guide for cancelled stamps?     |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Moderator

United States
12330 Posts |
|
|
The covers are quite interesting, worth more than the stamps alone. (First one is a special delivery R.P.O. cover.) Please post image of the back of this one. Others should also comment on the machine cancels on the other covers. Don |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Valued Member
United States
7 Posts |
|
|
Moderator

United States
12330 Posts |
|
|
Thanks, Moved thread to a category where you should get more feedback. Don |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Valued Member
United States
7 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
7 Posts |
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
2013 Posts |
|
|
Quote: I think the first stamp is a 634A Type 2, from looking / studying other stamps in that type.
it's not a type II, it's a type I Quote: Would a company that certifies stamps certify one that is attached to an envelope, or does it have to be loose / free of envelope?
This stamp should be certified, or not? Why would you send certifies a 634A that sell $ 3 to $ 5 on ebay ? The price in the left column is for a mint stamp not a used one, and besides, it's not a 634A, I check quickly by comparing image with Photoshop with yours to make measurement, it's look very much like a 25 cents stamps |
Send note to Staff
|
| Edited by area66 - 05/06/2017 8:17 pm |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
7 Posts |
|
|
Thanks for your analysis. This stamp fooled me, I thought the signs were there for a type 11 - it has a thin 0 in the lower box to left of the 2, the scroll is detailed and has a slight gap between it and the outline of GW picture, and has details in hair and more lines in forehead. UPDATE: Just checked these against one on ebay, and this does show not as much gap (scroll) and hair is not as detailed on mine. If it is not a 634A, then what is it? A plain 634? Learning about what it is would help not only me. What about the other stamps on the envelopes? All run of the mill too? |
Send note to Staff
|
| Edited by GmanStamp - 05/06/2017 9:32 pm |
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
1414 Posts |
|
|
To get to any conclusions, better scans are needed to determine the die types. The 634 is unequivocally a type I in the close up scan. The 319 scans are too small to be used to determine if any of the stamps are Die 2. In my experience, ebay is not a good site for stamp identification unless the goal is to do random. Some sellers do not have any ability to distinguish die types and may describe their stamps as the most expensive or exotic variety. |
Send note to Staff
|
|
Replies: 16 / Views: 16,332 |
|