Stamp Community Family of Web Sites
Thousands of stamps, consistently graded, competitively priced and hundreds of in-depth blog posts to read








Stamp Community Forum
 
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

Stamp Identifications?

Next Page    
 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 36 / Views: 5,442Next Topic
Page: of 3
Valued Member
United States
305 Posts
Posted 07/23/2010   2:13 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this topic Add Gaff to your friends list Get a Link to this Message
Anyone with access to a catalog of what looks like Japanese airmail willing to help me out with these? Thanks!













Send note to Staff

Valued Member
United States
305 Posts
Posted 07/23/2010   2:16 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Gaff to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Well...one of them says Republic of China, so I'm guessing Chinese?

Still, if anyone does know more about them, it would be appreciated!
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Valued Member
United Kingdom
59 Posts
Posted 07/23/2010   2:18 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add james204 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
They're from Taiwan. Can't help you with catalogue numbers I'm afraid but I recognise some of them from my own collection
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
6756 Posts
Posted 07/23/2010   2:25 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add khj to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Yes, they are all from the Republic of China. Scott #s are

C61
C53
C30(watermarked) or C40 (unwatermarked)
C75
C72
C69
C6

k
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Edited by khj - 07/23/2010 2:28 pm
Valued Member
United States
305 Posts
Posted 07/23/2010   3:52 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Gaff to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Thanks!
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Bedrock Of The Community
Australia
38679 Posts
Posted 07/23/2010   7:35 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add rod222 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Nice stamps Gaff,
esp the last one.

May I ask how you took the images please?
I am curious on how they get an overall orange tone
to them
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
Australia
3547 Posts
Posted 07/23/2010   8:52 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add tonymacg to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
The Chinese for 'Republic of China' (now Taiwan) is #20013;#33775;#27665;#22269;. (Apologies for the last character: on these stamps it will appear in a slightly different form - but if the first three characters match, reading from left to right, or right to left, it's Republic of China/Taiwan.)

Japan is #26085;#26412; or on older stamps it may appear as #22823;#26085;#26412;#24093;#22269; (again, with the last character in a different, more complex, form). But if you can find #26085;#26412; on the stamp, it's Japan.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Bedrock Of The Community
Australia
38679 Posts
Posted 07/23/2010   9:10 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add rod222 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply


How say you this ?



Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
Australia
3547 Posts
Posted 07/23/2010   11:04 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add tonymacg to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Rodney, it will work up to a point - somewhere after the mid-1950s. At that time, China started on a campaign of reforming its script, and simplified the majority of characters. One character that was affected was #22269;, the character for country in #20013;#22269; or #20013;#33775;#22269;. The version I've used is the simplified version; the version that appears on older Chinese stamps (and is still used on Taiwan and I think Hong Kong) stamps was used prior to the reforms as well.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Bedrock Of The Community
Australia
38679 Posts
Posted 07/23/2010   11:19 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add rod222 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Thanks Tony,
I cannot read your examples, perhaps I have
a setting awry on my computer.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
Australia
3547 Posts
Posted 07/23/2010   11:24 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add tonymacg to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Actually, Rod, looking at my post now, I see that the characters have come out gibberish - even though they displayed perfectly on my Preview screen.

Anyway, the offending character is the one like a box, with contents inside. The more complex version of the contents in the box is the old version; the simpler version is the new, Simplified version.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
6756 Posts
Posted 07/24/2010   03:12 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add khj to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Just to clarify a few things (not necessarily corrections)...


Quote:
'Republic of China' (now Taiwan)

Taiwan is the name of an island, and is also the name of a province. The Republic of China (ROC) is the name of a country, whose main province still under its sovereignty is the province of Taiwan. This is ignoring political issues, and just looking at it from a geographical point of view.

The People's Republic of China (PRC) does not recognize the sole sovereignty of the Republic of China, and regards Taiwan as a renegade province. That is the political reality (not taking sides here).

So technically, these are stamps of the "Republic of China", not Taiwan. There ARE some stamps of Taiwan (also known as Formosa) issued during Japanese control. I know a lot of people use ROC and Taiwan interchangeably, but there is a technical difference (not related to political issues).

*******

Rod222 showed a nice pic of Chinese characters from his amazing philatelic archive. But I want to clarify the pic (keeping in mind the clarification I gave above regarding stamps from Taiwan and stamps from the Republic of China).

Upper left characters [Zhong Guo] -- this literally means "middle kingdom/country", and is translated as China; these characters (in their respective traditional/simplified scripts) are present in both PRC and ROC stamps

Upper right characters [Zhong Hua] -- this is a part phrase and cannot really have an exact meaningful translation but is associated with the adjective "chinese"; it is part of the name for ROC; it is NOT the translation for Taiwan -- if you go to Google translate and type Taiwan, you will see two completely different characters for "Taiwan" because it is a different word.

Middle row of characters -- no problems here, very well illustrated; but again, note it is Republic of China, not Taiwan stamps.

Bottom 2 rows of characters -- I would clarify that it is PRC (not China) and ROC (not Taiwan), because neither of these apply to Chinese stamps during the monarchy.

Just my thoughts... just minor technicalities.

k
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
6756 Posts
Posted 07/24/2010   03:24 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add khj to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply

Quote:
it will work up to a point - somewhere after the mid-1950s. At that time, China started on a campaign of reforming its script, and simplified the majority of characters.

That is correct. In fact, a few of the earliest provincial (liberated areas) issues could almost pass for ROC stamps if you could not read what the additional script actually says!

Also, as a side note. Much simplified script had long existed, including the simplified box-like character you noted for "country". The difference is that the Communists expanded the simplified script character set by simplifying even more characters, and in some cases, further simplifying already simplified characters. Furthermore, they mandated the change to the simplified characters and incorporated it in the education process.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
Australia
3547 Posts
Posted 07/24/2010   06:00 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add tonymacg to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Just to clarify the matter of simplified Chinese: 'simplified' characters have been around for as long as Chinese has been written cursively, which is to say for an awfully long time. However, there were no firm rules as to how characters were simplified, although there were conventional simplifications. When I was hunting for a suitable logo for my (translation) company, the blindingly obvious choice was the character for 'translation' - which happens to be a rather attractive-looking character in any case.

I borrowed a compendium of specimens of great Chinese calligraphy, and turned to the entries for the character yi, 'translation'. Some examples were so artistically cursive and simplified that I couldn't make out what they were. Some were in an archaic form I didn't much like, but this specimen:



perfectly captured the old, un-simplified version of the character, both artistically and legibly, so I used it. It drives Chinese and Japanese who've only learnt the modern simplified forms of characters to distraction. It's easy to work forwards, from the old complex forms, to the simplified versions, because they were always used; it can be very hard to work backwards from the simplified to the complex forms.

To give an idea of the simplification involved, my company logo took 20 brushstrokes to write; the simplified forms take six in Chinese and 11 in Japanese.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Valued Member
United States
305 Posts
Posted 07/25/2010   10:57 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Gaff to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Lots of information. Thanks...

Rod: I took pictures of the stamps with my camera, since I don't have a scanner. I hate using a flash, so the orange tone is the result of ambient light (i.e. the lamp next to me!)...
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Bedrock Of The Community
Australia
38679 Posts
Posted 07/25/2010   11:47 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add rod222 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
I see, thanks Gaff.

Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Page: of 3 Previous TopicReplies: 36 / Views: 5,442Next Topic  
Next Page
 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.

Go to Top of Page

Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Stamp Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Stamp Community Family - All rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Stamp Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Privacy Policy / Terms of Use    Advertise Here
Stamp Community Forum © 2007 - 2026 Stamp Community Forums
It took 0.21 seconds to lick this stamp. Powered By: Snitz Forums 2000 Version 3.4.05