| Author |
Replies: 17 / Views: 3,509 |
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
3568 Posts |
|
|
I can find this stamp with the posthorn, and I can find it listed without the posthorn and another overprint but nothing with no without posthorn or overprint. Can someone help with a Scott number please? Thanks - Jeff 
|
|
Send note to Staff
|
| Edited by jhlovell - 03/23/2011 4:53 pm |
|
|
|
|
Bedrock Of The Community
Australia
38679 Posts |
|
|
I'd suggest it belongs with the stamp previously released of William 1.
"stamps without opt were not issued and those offered came from looted stocks.
although SG does not say this for this issue, it would explain the opts.
|
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
3568 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock Of The Community
Australia
38679 Posts |
|
|
That's what I assume Jeff, it needs verification. Jeff lovell runs a country, He prints 10 million stamps with his likeness, Some blackguard pinches 1 million stamps from the back shed. What are you going to do? authorise the stamp and lose 1 million receipts? Or, overprint the remainders and authorise those, thereby making the unoverprinted issue null and void. easy peasy. Same thing may have happened to this stamp  |
Send note to Staff
|
| Edited by rod222 - 03/20/2011 11:02 pm |
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
Australia
1865 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock Of The Community
Australia
38679 Posts |
|
|
Thanks a lot 22crows, I love reading christer brunstrom a great philatelic journalist.
That was an interesting, albeit convoluted story.
|
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
3568 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
Germany
11 Posts |
|
|
You are all wrong, I'm afraid.:-)
In fact it is simply a newspaper stamp.
Peter |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
3568 Posts |
|
|
Thanks Peter, my Scott does not show this. can you see a picture? Thanks Jeff |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Valued Member
Germany
11 Posts |
|
|
No, Jeff, my catalogue does not show those stamps either - but you can find those having been overprinted and thus converted to postage stamps. In the description you will find the words "on newspaper stamps".
Peter |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Bedrock Of The Community
Australia
38679 Posts |
|
|
Before you begin calling people wrong, you need evidence my friend.
AFAIK these were never officially issued without an overprint (BESA in a label or a posthorn) Let's see your proof, then we can apologise.
|
Send note to Staff
|
| Edited by rod222 - 03/23/2011 7:29 pm |
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
6756 Posts |
|
|
Far from being an expert here, but all I've "heard" in the past regarding use as a newspaper stamp has always been associated with the 1922 "Q 1" overprint stamp. I am NOT saying that overprinted stamp was a newspaper stamp. However, that is the only time I've heard reference to the stamp design as a newspaper stamp and every time I've heard of it, the stamp itself has been presented as the newspaper stamp of 1922 (NOT 1920). The first postal overprinted stamp was issued in 1920. So clearly, the stamp was put into use before 1922. I do not understand the discrepancy in the dates, other than to wonder if it was LATER used as a newspaper stamp? I guess I'm asking: 1) was this a normal postage stamp that was later converted to newspaper stamp usage (without overprint); 2) a newspaper stamp converted to normal postage stamp usage; 3) or a stamp only authorized for postal usage after overprint? But I'm completely guessing here. Like Rod, I would be very interested in seeing catalog/reference documentation for all this. Again, all I have read/heard in the past was 2nd-hand (or on a dealer sales page). Hopefully, someone has a catalog or reference that can shed more light.  k |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Bedrock Of The Community
Australia
38679 Posts |
|
|
I'll pop it in my suitcase and take it over to another ng for an opinion.
No one really has said what it was, until downunder, we were only suggesting usage, and downunder's reply was probably meant in a tease, but such evidence is not convincing in a truly philatelic sense.
After 22crows link, I would think this stamp was not issued, either for political reasons given by 22crows post, or by the looting scenario.
Yep, it would be nice to nail it down Klasboer's site doesn't offer images, so a lot has been left to guess, but he does show a series in the bust issue.
|
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
6756 Posts |
|
|
Quote: Klasboer's site doesn't offer images, so a lot has been left to guess I see Klaseboer also mentions that "magic phrase" -- Quote: (Newspaper stamp of 1922) But again, what is the source/basis for this statement? Please let us know what you find out, Rod! Or Peter, if you can find a reference, that would be great too!  k |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Bedrock Of The Community
Australia
38679 Posts |
|
|
Still only an opinion, but seems I wasn't as "wrong" as some may have believed  proving Philately can be treacherous ground for definitive comments. According to "The stamps and posts of Albania and Epirus 1878 to 1945" by John S Phipps, they are definitive stamps prepared for use but not issued. In more detail, these are stamps which the French commandant had ordered from the French government stamp printing works but which did not reach Shkoder until after the international occupation had ended. They consist fo 6 values with the effigy of Skenderbeg superimposed on an Albanian double eagle and of a postage due series of 4 values whith a view of the fortress of Shkoder. The book lists Brunel and Wallisch as references. Regards, Nick (Mr. Nick Bridgewater) |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
3568 Posts |
|
|
So if I read all of the thread correctly the majority opinion is that this item was legitimately ordered for use and became obsolete before issue and so never was issued? And all of this "with reservation?" or is Mr Bridgewater the end of the story? (Sorry I do not know the name) - Jeff |
Send note to Staff
|
| Edited by jhlovell - 03/24/2011 11:22 am |
|
Replies: 17 / Views: 3,509 |
|